Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 148742

Summary: emerge gnome-extra/hal-device-manager-0.5-r1 failed
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Roman Polach <rpolach>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: major    
Priority: High    
Version: 2006.1   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Roman Polach 2006-09-23 01:04:18 UTC
I got this error while emerging hal-device-manager,
strange, because either hal-device-manager nor hal packages do not use "python" USE-flag






# emerge hal-device-manager
Calculating dependencies... done!

>>> Emerging (1 of 1) gnome-extra/hal-device-manager-0.5-r1 to /
 * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ...                                      [ ok ]
 * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ...                                     [ ok ]
 * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...                                    [ ok ]

!!! ERROR: gnome-extra/hal-device-manager-0.5-r1 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1562:   Called dyn_setup
  ebuild.sh, line 665:   Called pkg_setup
  hal-device-manager-0.5-r1.ebuild, line 24:   Called built_with_use '>=sys-apps /hal-0.5-r1' 'python'
  eutils.eclass, line 1614:   Called die

!!! sys-apps/hal-0.5.7-r3 does not actually support the python USE flag!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if rel evant.






# emerge -pv1 hal

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-apps/hal-0.5.7-r3  USE="crypt -acpi -debug -dmi -doc -pcmcia  (-selinux)" 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB






# emerge -pv1 hal-device-manager

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-extra/hal-device-manager-0.5-r1  0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-23 01:42:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 147738 ***