| Summary: | audacious-1.2.0_rc1 ebuild lacks sufficient RDEPENDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Karsten Baumgarten <karsten.baumgarten> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | trivial | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | 2006.1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Karsten Baumgarten
2006-09-22 17:28:33 UTC
Sorry, this doesn't make much sense. Reopen with some errors and emerge --info, or explain better what's your problem. audacious can't DEPEND on its plugins, that would only produce a circular dependency. Uhm...you got me wrong here. I did not mention a dependency for audacious on its plugins, but rather a PDEPEND contained in its ebuild (which is just fine, because we want audacious-plugins to be merged after audacious). The problem is NOT the _P_DEPEND, but the missing packages in _R_DEPEND in the audacious ebuild. It was there in previous versions of the ebuild. If you emerge audacious-1.2.0_rc1, it'll show up as the first package to be merged (granted that you have the packages installed, which the ebuild specifies in RDEPEND). Please see Bug #148729 for the error that arises due to this problem. Marking as duplicate. if you mean something else, then finally post the error messages, because you still didn't explain your problem. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148729 *** Oh well, I guess commenting on that would just lead to nothing but a rant. Marking it as a duplicate is just fine... |