Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 148721

Summary: audacious-1.2.0_rc1 ebuild lacks sufficient RDEPENDS
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Karsten Baumgarten <karsten.baumgarten>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: trivial    
Priority: High    
Version: 2006.1   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Karsten Baumgarten 2006-09-22 17:28:33 UTC
The build order is wrong when emerging audacious-1.2.0_rc1, since the ebuild lacks sufficient RDEPENDS (like those in earlier versions). It has a PDEPEND on audacious-plugins, which would pull in some (all?) of the required packages, but that's too late for compiling audacious itself. A simple workaround is to use the RDEPENDS of an earlier version of the ebuild (I used audacious-1.1.2-r1.ebuild).

REPRODUCIBLE: yes, by emerging audacious-1.2.0_rc1
WORKAROUND  : add RDEPENDS (see above)
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-22 17:32:19 UTC
Sorry, this doesn't make much sense. Reopen with some errors and emerge --info, or explain better what's your problem. audacious can't DEPEND on its plugins, that would only produce a circular dependency.
Comment 2 Karsten Baumgarten 2006-09-23 01:22:21 UTC
Uhm...you got me wrong here. I did not mention a dependency for audacious on its plugins, but rather a PDEPEND contained in its ebuild (which is just fine, because we want audacious-plugins to be merged after audacious). The problem is NOT the _P_DEPEND, but the missing packages in _R_DEPEND in the audacious ebuild. It was there in previous versions of the ebuild. If you emerge audacious-1.2.0_rc1, it'll show up as the first package to be merged (granted that you have the packages installed, which the ebuild specifies in RDEPEND). Please see Bug #148729 for the error that arises due to this problem.

Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-23 01:40:34 UTC
Marking as duplicate. if you mean something else, then finally post the error messages, because you still didn't explain your problem.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148729 ***
Comment 4 Karsten Baumgarten 2006-09-23 01:58:45 UTC
Oh well, I guess commenting on that would just lead to nothing but a rant. Marking it as a duplicate is just fine...