Summary: | dev-libs/openct-0.6.8 fails with "ifdhandler.h:20: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'LPTSTR'" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Joseph Pingenot <gentoobugzilla> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | petre rodan (RETIRED) <kaiowas> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | martin, narancs, srcshelton |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2006.0 | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | output from emerge --info |
Description
Joseph Pingenot
2006-09-03 17:22:39 UTC
Created attachment 95901 [details]
output from emerge --info
you must be using an old version of pcsc-lite. either upgrade to latest ~x86 pcsc-lite (or remove it if you don't really need it), and then re-merge openct. you might want to open a stabilisation request bug for pcsc-lite. reopen if this does not solve the issue for you. Unmerging and re-emerging pcsc-lite (stable 1.2.0) doesn't work. If an unstable version is required to get this software working, than I think it should depend on the unstable version - this is a better solution than letting emerge fail every time ... Depending on an ~x86 version of pcsc-lite results in an emerge tree dependency error which is more helful that "error: expected ...". Now merging unstable pcsc-lite. (In reply to comment #3) > If an unstable version is required to get this software working, > than I think it should depend on the unstable version > this is a better solution than letting emerge fail > every time ... Depending on an ~x86 version of pcsc-lite results in an emerge > tree dependency error which is more helful that "error: expected ...". why exactly is better to have a broken tree then a compile error due to an antique library version? not to mention that pcsc-lite is in no way a dependency for openct. > Now merging unstable pcsc-lite. this bug will not be hit once bug# 145145 will be closed. *** Bug 147786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 150235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 153790 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |