Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 139505

Summary: stable request dev-lang/swig-1.3.25
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) <agaffney>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Chris White (RETIRED) <chriswhite>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: fauli
Priority: High    
Version: 2006.0   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-06 19:19:51 UTC
In my x86 catalyst builds, I ran across the issue of swig-1.3.21 failing to build with gcc4. I stabled 1.3.25 in my snapshot, and it built just fine. This version is already stable on a few arches.
Comment 1 Chris White (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-06 19:43:11 UTC
The original bug report was for a gcc4 failure.  Looking at the ChangeLog it seems ppc was effected by this too, so I'd rather chuck this across the board.  So here's the keywords lowdown:

alpha ~amd64 ~arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ~ppc-macos ppc64 ~s390 ~sparc ~x86

So I need amd64, mips, ppc-macos, s390 (which is like Spanky and that's it I think), sparc, and x86 to mark swig-1.3.21 stable on their perspective arches.  As a future roadmap I'll be looking at 1.3.29 after a month.
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-06 23:12:14 UTC
Is this bug connected in any way to bug #117218 ? To me it seems so.
Comment 3 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-07 07:02:07 UTC
So shouldn't this be marked as a DUPE and have the arches added to the other bug?

Anyway, x86/amd64 done... so no need to add them if you do DUPE it.
Comment 4 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-10 14:48:35 UTC
sparc stable.
Comment 5 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2006-07-15 07:00:09 UTC
We're not stable in any swig as far as I can see.  Because of the USE-flags which require stuff which is not there, I'd rather not stable this on ppc-macos.
Comment 6 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-18 06:09:31 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117218 ***