Summary: | qt keyworded ~x86-fbsd, but qt-unixODBC isn't | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) <carlo> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pclouds |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED)
2006-05-28 14:49:33 UTC
I know, but I haven't had time to fix it yet. The .badindev is _not_ fatal. Prefixing with !x86-fbsd? until it's fixed would be much better. The portage tree isn't some overlay. That's what .badindev is started for in the first place. I can't start looking for tons of optional deps, nor I want to use.mask stuff, and worse than worse use inverse arch deps. Mr_Bones_ already acknowledged that this way is non-intrusive and will allow Gentoo/FreeBSD users to have a working system and developers not to be bothered. I'll be looking into it when I'll find a way to test it. In the mean time, it's a .badindev, indev. *** Bug 149922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |