Bug 133781 – dev-lang/tcc-0.9.22 fails to compile on uclibc/hardened

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST

[Description Natanael Copa 2006-05-19 07:35:20 UTC]

gcc -O2 -g -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -falign-functions=0 -fno-strict-aliasing -o tcc_g tcc.c -ldl
gcc -O2 -g -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -falign-functions=0 -fno-strict-aliasing -DTCC_TARGET_C67 -o c67-tcc tcc.c -ldl
gcc -O2 -g -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -falign-functions=0 -fno-strict-aliasing -DTCC_TARGET_ARM -o arm-tcc tcc.c -ldl
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/temp/ccaoVM06.o: In function `parse_number':
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/work/tcc-0.9.22/tcc.c:3206: undefined reference to `ldexp'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [tcc_g] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/temp/ccNp22y0.o: In function `parse_number':
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/work/tcc-0.9.22/tcc.c:3206: undefined reference to `ldexp'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [arm-tcc] Error 1
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/temp/ccXK5iIi.o: In function `parse_number':
/var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.22/work/tcc-0.9.22/tcc.c:3206: undefined reference to `ldexp'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [c67-tcc] Error 1

!!! ERROR: dev-lang/tcc-0.9.22 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 18, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

Portage 2.0.54-r2 (uclibc/x86/hardened, gcc-3.4.5, uclibc-0.9.28-r0, 2.6.16-gentoo-r7 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.16-gentoo-r7 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
distcc 2.18.3 i386-gentoo-linux-uclibc (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.4.2
dev-python/pycrypto: [Not Present]
dev-util/ccache:     [Not Present]
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i386-gentoo-linux-uclibc"
CFLAGS="-march=i386 -Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i386-gentoo-linux-uclibc"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/bind /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/eselect/compiler /etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-Os -pipe"
DISTDIR="/var/cache/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig buildpkg distlocks nodoc noinfo noman sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
PKGDIR="/var/cache/packages/default"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/alpine-portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X509 bitmap-fonts bri bzip2 cdr cli cracklib curl dri encode expat gd gmp hardened iproute2 ipv6 jpeg mad mhash minimal ncurses netboot ogg oss pci pcmcia pic png pppd readline reflection rrdtool sensord session snmp speex spl ssl tdb truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts uclibc udev usb vorbis winbind xorg zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_uclibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

[Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-28 05:46:16 UTC]

Re-assign wrt Bug 147726.

[Comment 2 SpanKY 2006-09-28 06:11:45 UTC]

tcc simply needs to link in -lm ... but this is a bug in tcc, not uclibc

[Comment 3 Natanael Copa 2007-04-04 13:06:29 UTC]

Created attachment 115438 [details, diff]
tcc-0.9.23-lm.patch

just adds -lm

[Comment 4 Natanael Copa 2007-04-04 13:08:03 UTC]

Created attachment 115439 [details, diff]
tcc-0.9.23-uclibc.patch

adds a test for __UCLIBC__ to disable malloc hooks

[Comment 5 Natanael Copa 2007-04-04 13:23:14 UTC]

Mail sent to mailing list [e-mail] to notify upstream developers.

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-08 11:46:04 UTC]

is this still needed for 0.9.26-r2?