Summary: | xorg-server and drivers should filter LDFLAGS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) <eva> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED)
2006-05-04 04:24:20 UTC
Don't report as-needed bugs unless you are using latest binutils (2.16.92). And, remove -Wl,-z,now altogether, sticking something like that into global LDFLAGS is not a proper way to do such stuff. If you get lazy bindings QA warning, file a bug. Hum, binutils-2.16.92 is still hardmasked ( -* ) while xorg-server is ~arch, so I guess there is something to do anyway.
> And, remove -Wl,-z,now altogether, sticking something like that into global
> LDFLAGS is not a proper way to do such stuff. If you get lazy bindings QA
> warning, file a bug.
Thanks for the notice
(In reply to comment #2) > Hum, binutils-2.16.92 is still hardmasked ( -* ) while xorg-server is ~arch, so > I guess there is something to do anyway. -as-needed doesn't work correctly w/ current arch/~arch binutils. You need to use the hardmasked version if you want to experiment with that. :) ok, I'll test it later, thanks. ok tested with the latest binutils for some times now and it seems good. Side question : what does it change if I mark the bug as closed ? |