| Summary: | Version Bump: gthumb 2.7.5.1 released | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | crusaderky |
| Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
| Status: | VERIFIED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | gthumb-2.7.5.1.ebuild | ||
|
Description
crusaderky
2006-04-25 04:39:24 UTC
Created attachment 85446 [details]
gthumb-2.7.5.1.ebuild
unstable release series <O_O> actually, it's perfectly usable although somehow less stable than 2.6.x. I really don't see what's the problem in making it ~x86, while 2.6.x remains tagged as x86. actually we don't care, ~arch is not for unstable stuff. We don't put development releases into portage. Apart from the fact that it IS reasonably stable - I've been using it with satisfaction for almost 2 weeks now - if you consider a thing "unstable", you should just mask and let the users decide. It's not a matter of stable/unstable, it's a matter of stable/development. Development is odd-numbered minor numbers. We don't put those into portage, as a matter of policy, no matter how "stable" they are. When upstream release a "stable" version (with an even minor number, for gnome 2.16.0), we'll put it into portage. |
