Summary: | typing 'slocate' into the search term box doesn't locate all slocate bugs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Mark Knecht <markknecht> |
Component: | Bugzilla | Assignee: | Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) <jforman> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Mark Knecht
2006-04-22 10:21:59 UTC
Mark, This has been an oft-bugged problem, which is why under the search terms we've added the note to add 'ALL' to your search terms. It is an upstream problem, one which I've mentioned them before, because it has to do with the CGI search on that page. -Jeffrey Thanks for the hint. I notice the note but apparently was using it incorrectly: slocate ALL finds nothing ALL slocate finds eveything I should have found before. Possibly the note should say prefix 'ALL' instead of affix 'ALL'. I'm not an English major and am an 'American' speaker. Two strikes against me right there! ;-) From Google using define:affix <SNIP> Definitions of affix on the Web: * attach to; "affix the seal here" * append: add to the very end; "He appended a glossary to his novel where he used an invented language" * a linguistic element added to a word to produce an inflected or derived form * attach or become attached to a stem word; "grammatical morphemes affix to the stem" <SNIP> None the less, thanks very much. I'm sorry to have been submitting duplicate bug reports for so long and making Jakub do all this work. I'm sure he's emmensely tired of me but hopefully less so in the future! |