Summary: | Ebuild for KDE DVD Authoring Wizard V1.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | ml |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | cweiske, gentoo, marat, njsg |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://dvdauthorwizard.sourceforge.net | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Ebuild for DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 (Should go to media-video)
metadata.xml ChangeLog for DVDAuthorWizard DVDAuthorWizard-1.2.1.ebuild DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0.ebuild ChangeLog DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog files/dvdauthorwizard.desktop dvdauthorwizard-1.3.0.ebuild dvdauthorwizard.desktop dvdauthorwizard-1.3.0.ebuild dvdauthorwizard.desktop |
Description
ml
2006-04-09 15:57:12 UTC
And it's far more easy to use than qdvdauthor! Created attachment 84330 [details]
Ebuild for DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 (Should go to media-video)
Created attachment 84331 [details]
metadata.xml
Created attachment 84332 [details]
ChangeLog for DVDAuthorWizard
Created attachment 86082 [details]
DVDAuthorWizard-1.2.1.ebuild
Created attachment 86804 [details]
DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0.ebuild
Comment on attachment 84332 [details] ChangeLog for DVDAuthorWizard # ChangeLog for media-video/DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 # Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 # $Header: $ *DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0 (15 May 2006) 15 May 2006; Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de ChangeLog : Version update. Ebuild submitted by Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de. *DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 (9 Apr 2006) 9 Apr 2006; Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de ChangeLog : Initial import. Ebuild submitted by Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de. Comment on attachment 84332 [details] ChangeLog for DVDAuthorWizard ># ChangeLog for media-video/DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 ># Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 ># $Header: $ > *DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0 (15 May 2006) 15 May 2006; Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de ChangeLog : Version update. Ebuild submitted by Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de. >*DVDAuthorWizard-1.2 (9 Apr 2006) > > 9 Apr 2006; Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de ChangeLog : > Initial import. Ebuild submitted by Rene Bartsch ml@bartschnet.de. Created attachment 86805 [details]
ChangeLog
*** Bug 134399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Two suggestions for improvement: 1) The ebuild implies that the user uses KDE split ebuilds, so RDEPEND should be "|| ( kde-base/kommander kde-base/kdewebdev )" instead. 2) The SRC_URI should be mirror://sourceforge/dvdauthorwizard/... Created attachment 89572 [details]
DVDAuthorWizard-1.3.0-r1.ebuild
Created attachment 89574 [details]
ChangeLog
Created attachment 89629 [details, diff]
files/dvdauthorwizard.desktop
Created attachment 89630 [details]
dvdauthorwizard-1.3.0.ebuild
Reworked ebuild... tbh, the packaging and install of this thing sucks :=)
Created attachment 89644 [details]
dvdauthorwizard.desktop
Created attachment 89645 [details]
dvdauthorwizard-1.3.0.ebuild
Fixed ebuild (was missing KDE deps).
Sooo - and now: this bug is getting a shiny nice WONTFIX. Why?
<snip>
You are using a buggy (3.1) version of BASH which fails to run the KDE DVD Authoring Wizard.
Please downgrade to a stable BASH version.
</snip>
When upstream fixes their stuff to work correctly with up-to-date bash, feel free to reopen. Until then, no point in wasting time here.
WONTFIX. (In reply to comment #18) > WONTFIX. > What's wrong with the 3.1 bash ??? Can we set some dependency to avoid using 3.1 bash (some kind of slot ...)? (In reply to comment #19) > What's wrong with the 3.1 bash ??? NFC, ask upstream. ;) > Can we set some dependency to avoid using 3.1 bash (some kind of slot ...)? No, definitely not. Needs to be fixed upstream as well. *** Bug 180950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 121687 [details]
dvdauthorwizard.desktop
Comment on attachment 121687 [details]
dvdauthorwizard.desktop
Cosmetic changes
Maybe, time to reopen? |