Summary: | Feature Request: Unmasking metapackage unmasks dependencies | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Travers Buda <traversbuda> |
Component: | Core - Dependencies | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jakub, m.debruijne |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Travers Buda
2006-04-06 22:59:31 UTC
From portage point of view, metabuild is no different than a normal ebuild. Automagic unmasking of dependencies for whatever package you put into p.unmask is a bad idea. Which dependencies would you like to unmask, the direct ones? Or the indirect ones as well? Pretty much defeats the whole point of package.mask. It isn't there to make your life easier, it's there to prevent possible damage to your system. Emerge will not do this, write a script/tool. |