| Summary: | app-emacs/ljupdate-darcs - new ebuild | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Xavier Maillard <zedek> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | emacs, zedek |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
| Version: | 2006.0 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 128307 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
| Attachments: | ljupdate-darcs.ebuild | ||
|
Description
Xavier Maillard
2006-03-31 16:16:07 UTC
Created attachment 83574 [details]
ljupdate-darcs.ebuild
See enclosed the ebuild.
Note that this may need changes and at least testing with the darcs.eclass that actually got added to portage since it was different to the one submitted in bug #128307. Is there any chance that somebody review this or even correct it so it matches what the official darcs.eclass does ? Regards Comment on attachment 83574 [details]
ljupdate-darcs.ebuild
Please submit attached ebuilds as text/plain.
The ebuild fails in src_unpack: >>> Unpacking source... * Fetching darcs repository into /usr/portage/distfiles/darcs-src... * Running darcs get --partial --set-scripts-executable --repo-name= darcs failed: You must provide 'get' with either one or two arguments. And if I call darcs manually, I get HTTP error 404. > As a quick testcase against my darcs.eclass, I packaged this live journal > mode for emacs. Anyway, is this only intended as a test case, or should we consider adding it to the Portage tree? |