Bug 127233

Summary:	pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4.ebuild (update)
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Simon Ruggier <Simon80>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo PDA project <pda>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	enhancement
Priority:	High
Version:	2005.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4.ebuild pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_fPIC_fix.patch pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_fix.patch pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_all.patch pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_amd64.patch pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_ppc.patch pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-python_install_all.patch

Description Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 13:58:33 UTC

The stable version of pilot-link is from September 2003, and it looks like development is pretty dead at pilot-link.org.  This is a problem for anyone with some newer palms.  I thought that I needed the latest version to sync to my Z22, and put some effort into making an updated ebuild before I realized that it was possible to sync to my model using the existing version of pilot-link.  I decided to finish up,

My actions:
-copy pilot-link-0.11.8-r1.ebuild
-port over all of the relevant patches (the java makefile ones)
-fix a makefile in bindings/ to eliminate python make install sandbox violation, diff into pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-python_install_all.patch.  This was fine in the last version, I don't know why  someone removed a reference to $(DESTDIR) from the Makefile.
-update bindings/Java/libjpisock.c for a changed API, remove missing file from Makefile.in, and diff the two files into pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_fix.patch

Comment 1 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 13:59:37 UTC

Created attachment 82881 [details]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4.ebuild

Comment 2 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:00:19 UTC

Created attachment 82882 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_fPIC_fix.patch

Comment 3 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:00:52 UTC

Created attachment 82883 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_fix.patch

Comment 4 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:01:27 UTC

Created attachment 82884 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_all.patch

Comment 5 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:01:48 UTC

Created attachment 82885 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_amd64.patch

Comment 6 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:02:27 UTC

Created attachment 82886 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-java_install_ppc.patch

Comment 7 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:02:47 UTC

Created attachment 82887 [details, diff]
pilot-link-0.12.0_pre4-python_install_all.patch

Comment 8 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-22 14:07:06 UTC

A couple things I forgot to note - I haven't tested the tcltk USE flag, it could be broken, and also, this updated package breaks gnome-pilot and jpilot.  I might try to figure that out later, but for now, this is it.  Hopefully my effort in updating this ebuild will be useful to someone.

Comment 9 Simon Ruggier 2006-03-23 04:30:48 UTC

J-Pilot works if it is jpilot-0.99.8*.  This would mean that jpilot-0.99.7 just needs to have its dependencies revised.

Comment 10 Dominik Stadler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-04-23 12:24:04 UTC

This Bug sounds similar to Bug 89823, although this one seems to have a more complete ebuild available.

Comment 11 Simon Ruggier 2006-04-24 07:06:32 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 89823 ***

Comment 12 Hans Meine 2007-02-03 23:07:12 UTC

(In reply to comment #10)
> This Bug sounds similar to Bug 89823, although this one seems to have a more
> complete ebuild available.
I just attached an updated ebuild with three patches to Bug 89823, which should include all stuff discussed here, too.