| Summary: | Removing (direct) X dependency in app-shells/fish | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Frederik 'Freso' S. Olesen <bugs.gentoo.org> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) <dberkholz> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | liljencrantz |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 55422 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Frederik 'Freso' S. Olesen
2006-03-16 04:17:43 UTC
Uhm, can't we just make xsel compile conditional on X use flag, instead of a new ebuild? Anyway, fish depends only on two libs (libSM and liXext) w/ modular X, see the ebuild. Well, yes, one could do that. But wouldn't it be cleaner to have xsel as a separate package altogether? You wouldn't need to recompile xsel with new versions of fish, and vice versa. (fish seems to have a higher release rate than xsel though - but then, why fix something that isn't broken? :)) Also, from what I could gather, Axel wants to remove the xsel source from fish's source (feel free to correct me :)), so we might have to install it by itself eventually anyway. And yes I saw those two libs in the latest ebuild, however modular X isn't here just yet and removing any and all X dependencies should be possible. If someone wants to use fish on a box with no X, they currently need to install fish manually or hack the build. |