Summary: | openoffice-2.0.1 requires glib-2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Office Team <office> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alephlg |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED)
![]() Portage 2.0.54 (hardened/x86/2.6, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.14-hardened-r5 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.14-hardened-r5 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14 dev-lang/python: 2.3.5, 2.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.22 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -fforce-addr" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -fforce-addr" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks nodoc noinfo noman sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror http://distfiles.gentoo.org" MAKEOPTS="-j3" PKGDIR="/usr/portage//packages/x86/" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage/" SYNC="rsync://mirror/gentoo-portage" USE="bzip2 crypt cups dlloader expat hardened jpeg ncurses openntpd pam pic png python readline ssl tcpd tiff truetype udev userlocales x86 xml2 zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY Seemant, is this with a modified ebuild? Cause this is a build failure in a part of OOo which we are normally not building at all: the access-support (mdbtools). As we are not pulling in the necessary file, it is no surprise this fails. (In reply to comment #2) > Seemant, is this with a modified ebuild? Cause this is a build failure in a > part of OOo which we are normally not building at all: the access-support > (mdbtools). As we are not pulling in the necessary file, it is no surprise this > fails. > Seemant? Need some comment here. hi suka, I'm sorry for no response :( as far as I recall, this was a regular ebuild. I didn't change anything at all. Nearly lost this bug. Seemant: Do you still get that? Closing this, please reopen if you get this again, Seemant *** Bug 160977 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |