Summary: | sandbox eating all ram on mips (and other archs?) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Torgeir Hansen <torgeir> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | VERIFIED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | critical | CC: | azarah, cretin, h3y, jrray, pvdabeel, roughneck, seemant |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Patch to make the sandbox work on mips and possibly other archs |
Description
Torgeir Hansen
2002-12-16 03:13:04 UTC
Created attachment 6543 [details, diff]
Patch to make the sandbox work on mips and possibly other archs
Here's a very simple patch, which should make it simple to add other arch's if it turns out to fix a problem for others aswell. I'm playing happily in the sandbox with my mips-based Indy now :) I can confirm this works on mips Looks fine, applied to CVS. Gerk, can you confirm that if it works or not on PPC ? Robert (jrray) .. you still going to commit those fixes of yours ? Maybe just do them to -dev and -1.1, and if Possible, and Nick do us another masked portage for testing this sandbox ? Az: Hmm I'll check it out, but afaik sandbox still fails on PPC due to a kernel issue (dying in the untarring phase) and no one currently uses on PPC (by our reccomendation due to this). I'll commit them in a little bit. The -1.1 and -dev trees are a little out of sync so I need to merge them. Robert: I have been keeping them in sync, so dont worry about it. A bit off the topic ... I added -1.1 and -dev when I did the cleanups to sandbox, as I did a lot between work/home, and -dev was somewhat broken at stages. We may this think about removing -dev, although I dont know how/if Robert want to take up on maintaining ... if his latest patch solves most issues, etc ... Gerk: Running out of memory could be the cause of it dying during untarring ... guess its just an issue of how ppc kernel will handle it .... hasn't this been verified as ok yet, since mholzer now marked it as critical according to my inbox? is this still a problem ? no feedback -> closing Closing again. |