Summary: | genflags outputs inadvisable CFLAGS for amd64? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Jonathan Coome (RETIRED) <maedhros> |
Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | treecleaner |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3056816.html#3056816 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Jonathan Coome (RETIRED)
2006-01-24 14:06:34 UTC
yup, genflags is badly out of date. When I wrote it all arches gave input on what the correct flags were for their systems. It does badly need updating (a full rewrite actually), but I don't have time for it presently. My longterm objective is to see what languages are provided in the latest releases again, and re-write all of genflags in it, also providing support for the many newer chips that have come out since genflags was first written. If you could provide info on all of the newer /proc/cpuinfo for AMD64 machines, and the relevant CFLAGS to use, I'd appreciate it. Mask message said: # Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> (20 Oct 2008) # Masked for removal in 30 days (see bugs #120220, #137998, #170782) # genflags should never have been born. Output needs to be specific per GCC # version, and that's a big change. app-portage/genflags so treecleaners removed it. |