Summary: | udevd 0.81 is missing i2c entries | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | barthek <gejzer> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) <gregkh> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2005.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Other | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
barthek
2006-01-19 15:39:22 UTC
Did this work on any other version of udev? What does 'tree /sys/class/i2c-dev' show? although not sure 100% i believe it has worked before as expected (that is, sensors-detect script worked, which depend on /dev/i2c entries) /sys/class/i2c-dev is empty, although /sys/bus/i2c tree follows: /sys/bus/i2c/drivers /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/eeprom /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/eeprom/bind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/eeprom/unbind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/eeprom/module /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/dev_driver /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/dev_driver/bind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/dev_driver/unbind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/dev_driver/module /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78-isa /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78-isa/9191-0290 /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78-isa/bind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78-isa/unbind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78-isa/module /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78 /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78/bind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78/unbind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/lm78/module /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_adapter /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_adapter/bind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_adapter/unbind /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_adapter/module /sys/bus/i2c/devices /sys/bus/i2c/devices/9191-0290 quick note link in the 'devices' dir reads: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jan 23 20:30 9191-0290 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-9191/9191-0290 same here , all i2c support disappeared in moving from 079-r1 to 081-r1 previously working sensors no longer exist , all steps to detect sensors fail : no sensors , no devices etc. This is a sensors-detect issue, not a udev issue. hmm here we have a situation where something that has worked before (sensors-detect) has not changed but something thats responsible for that failure (udev) has changed. would you please elaborate on why its sensors-detect responsible and not recent changes to udev ? Because the sensors-detect code was trying to do odd things in detecting udev (there is a standard way to do it...) udev changed and sensors-detect didn't get fixed... |