Bug 119523 – New ebuilds: network simulator 2 and network animator

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED INVALID

[Description Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:44:11 UTC]

I need in my work to use the ns2 tools from http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Anyway, these ebuilds work for me, if you want to put these to the main tree, feel free.

(Based on skel.ebuilds and really simple ones, too). I cannot promise to maintain these, though.

[Comment 1 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:45:47 UTC]

Created attachment 77515 [details]
Tarball of ns2-2.29 and nam-1.11 ebuilds, with patches. Suggested category net-analyzer

[Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-01-19 02:49:25 UTC]

No tarballs, please...

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=3#doc_chap2

[Comment 3 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:50:35 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> No tarballs, please...
> 
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=3#doc_chap2
> 

Ok, will attach separately, then.

[Comment 4 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:51:07 UTC]

Created attachment 77516 [details]
Ns2 ebuild

[Comment 5 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:51:49 UTC]

Created attachment 77517 [details, diff]
Makefile fix for /usr/bin dir creation

[Comment 6 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:52:29 UTC]

Created attachment 77518 [details]
Network animator (NAM) ebuild, for visualizing ns2 results

[Comment 7 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-19 02:52:51 UTC]

Created attachment 77519 [details, diff]
GCC 3.4 patch for NAM

[Comment 8 Antti Mäkelä 2006-01-30 06:27:38 UTC]

It seems that both of these were already in portage, just under the name of "ns", not "ns 2" (and when I checked, the search function borked). Oops.

[Comment 9 Fpemud 2015-12-28 06:38:55 UTC]

I need to use ns in my work to simulate a network link with a bad quality, but I find that ns and nam are no longer in portage tree.
Are these packages removed? Is there any alternative?