Summary: | net-fs/sfs installs files into /include instead of /usr/include | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Thomas Tuttle <gentoo> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ephemient, jakub, net-fs, qa, treecleaner |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 147269 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: | exec prefix fix for sfs-0.7.2.ebuild |
Description
Thomas Tuttle
2006-01-14 14:43:44 UTC
I also found more problem emerge net-fs/sfs files/sfs-0.7.2-gcc3.patch.bz2 not found. if seems removed from portage. Man... nobody's touched this bug! Anyway, I found out that it installs a bunch of things into / instead of /usr. Someone probably hastily tried to move things from /usr/bin to /bin (as sfs might be necessary for boot on a system that uses it extensively) but didn't realize the ramifications. Created attachment 102861 [details, diff]
exec prefix fix for sfs-0.7.2.ebuild
I can't test this because SFS doesn't compile with GCC 4.1 (#147269), but it should work.
Apparently noone's from net-fs interested; going to m-needed and CCing treecleaners. please test the package.masked sfs-0.8.0_pre20070512. Isn't the ebuild missing an emake in src_compile()? sorry, got distracted. yep i commited an incomplete version. can you try again? the new revision is 1.2. Please, test net-fs/sfs-0.8.0_pre20070512 and get back to us. |