Summary: | glibc-2.3.6-r2 compilation fails on PPC | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Tommaso Mazzoni <tmazzoni> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | PPC Porters <ppc> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | toolchain |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2005.1 | ||
Hardware: | PPC | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Tommaso Mazzoni
2006-01-09 05:40:43 UTC
What version of binutils are you actually using currently? (binutils-config -l) If you are using one of the 2.16.91 versions, does 2.16.1 work? Yes, I'm using binutils-2.16.91.0.5. I'm going to try with 2.16.1 right away. Yes, with binutils-2.16.1 the compilation succeeds. Now the fact is, since I want to try the latest gcc-4.1 release, is this version of binutils fit for it? On the gcc site, they mention binutils > 2.16.91 is required only for IA-32/x86-64 targets. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html let the ppc team sort it out GNU ld version 2.16.1 in usage currently. Some of your use flags are really questionable. Redundant with your -mcpu/-mtune options: -mpowerpc-gfxopt You should never use this flag, it's set where needed by the ebuilds: -fPIC This option is still somewhat troublesome with 4.0, it should work better with 4.1: -ftree-vectorize As Luca said, 2.16.1 should be okay, Luca, should we mark that binutils -ppc? Oops, I didn't mean to close it. Luca says to close as invalid. |