Summary: | size of archive bug + -S vs -s | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Torgeir Hansen <torgeir> |
Component: | Unclassified | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | acooks, bug-wranglers, dshanker, h3y, moixa, thomas |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | Inclusion |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
workaround patch on 2.0.47-r10
different implementation |
Description
Torgeir Hansen
2002-12-09 03:40:56 UTC
Still confirm this here: Portage 2.0.47-r10 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.2, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.3.1-r4) Attaching workaround patch. Seems to work for me. Any issues? Created attachment 12151 [details, diff]
workaround patch on 2.0.47-r10
Still persists in 2.0.48 Still persists in 2.0.49-r15 Created attachment 23668 [details, diff]
different implementation
I'd like to do some benchmarks but this is too slow in general :(
*** Bug 24257 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** fixed *** Bug 56780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hmm, somehow the fix got removed ... my bad, that was for a esearch bug (fixed in 0.6.3). |