Bug 117505 – Stabling of gtk / pango / glib / cairo / atk

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-02 15:51:37 UTC]

All these packages should be tested and stabled together.

I am part of the x86 team, but would like another member to test to make sure.  I've been running these packages on an otherwise stable box for about a month, with no outstanding issues.

The specific problems with NVIDIA and RenderAccel have been "addressed" through a message displayed to the user in post install.  Please see bug #113123 if you would like to see more information about the bug.

Make comments about any GTK+ specific problems on the "Depends on bug" ( made specifically for GTK ).

This is in preparation for eventually stabling gnome 2.12.

Thanks!

package: target keywords

gtk+-2.8.8: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86

pango-1.10.2: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86

cairo-1.0.2: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, ppc macos, s390, sh, sparc, x86

glib-2.8.4: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, ppc macos, s390, sh, sparc, x86

atk-1.10.3: alpha,amd64,arm,hppa,ia64,mips,ppc,ppc64,s390,sparc,x86

[Comment 1 Fabian Groffen 2006-01-03 01:29:53 UTC]

glib-2.8.4: ppc-macos stable
cairo: not stabled as there exists no ppc-macos stable version 

[Comment 2 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 05:42:45 UTC]

sparc stable.

[Comment 3 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 08:27:43 UTC]

stable on ppc64

[Comment 4 Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 08:49:34 UTC]

amd64 done... i marked stable glitz-0.4.4 to satisfy cairo dependency

[Comment 5 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 15:13:39 UTC]

I stabled pango, cairo and glib on alpha. However gtk+'s tests fail:

--- >8 ---
make[4]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.8/work/gtk+-2.8.8/gdk-pixbuf'                --- expected-abi        2006-01-03 23:02:49 +0000                                                   +++ actual-abi  2006-01-03 23:02:49 +0000                                                           @@ -57,9 +57,6 @@                                                                                    gdk_pixbuf_loader_new_with_type                                                                     gdk_pixbuf_loader_set_size                                                                          gdk_pixbuf_loader_write                                                                            -gdk_pixbuf_major_version                                                                           -gdk_pixbuf_micro_version                                                                           -gdk_pixbuf_minor_version                                                                            gdk_pixbuf_new                                                                                      gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data                                                                            gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file                                                                           @@ -87,7 +84,6 @@                                                                                    gdk_pixbuf_simple_anim_iter_get_type                                                                gdk_pixbuf_simple_anim_new                                                                          gdk_pixbuf_unref                                                                                   -gdk_pixbuf_version                                                                                  gdk_pixdata_deserialize                                                                             gdk_pixdata_from_pixbuf                                                                             gdk_pixdata_serialize                                                                              FAIL: abicheck.sh 
--- >8 ---

Is that expected to fail ?

Cheers,
Ferdy

[Comment 6 John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 16:39:06 UTC]

just to add a note, spoke to ferdy and told him that it passes the tests for me ( on x86 ).

[Comment 7 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2006-01-04 15:26:50 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 8 Róbert Čerňanský 2006-01-05 11:24:55 UTC]

Please see bug #117916 which is related to this (oregano needs old cairo).

[Comment 9 Joe McCann (RETIRED) 2006-01-06 10:58:14 UTC]

*** Bug 112951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 10 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) 2006-01-08 04:43:53 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 11 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2006-01-11 11:58:10 UTC]

With respect to comment #5:

I tested some GTK+ applications (including gaim, evolution, gnumeric and abiword) and gtk-demo, and everything seems to work. However, I still get those errors on tests.

I stabled everything you asked for but gtk+-2.8.8. I'm hereby requesting advise from the Gnome Herd. I'm GTK+ clueless.

Cheers,
Ferdy

[Comment 12 SpanKY 2006-01-11 16:57:37 UTC]

gtk failing `make test` is something the GNOME team has ignored for a while ... see bugs 84078 and 83915

i'll go ahead and file a fresh one

[Comment 13 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2006-01-13 15:04:50 UTC]

Stable on alpha now.

Thanks SpanKY for filing that bug.

Cheers,
Ferdy

[Comment 14 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-03-13 13:44:37 UTC]

hppa done some time ago.

[Comment 15 Stephen Becker (RETIRED) 2006-04-14 18:31:53 UTC]

mips should be ahead on all of these now

[Comment 16 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-09-04 00:46:15 UTC]

old and done, marking as fixed