| Summary: | findutils 4.1.20-r1 assume hardwired location of pam_afs.so.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jan Hrabe <hrabe> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Stefaan De Roeck (RETIRED) <stefaan> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | ciaran.mccreesh |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Patch to remove afs-support from the currently stable findutils | ||
|
Description
Jan Hrabe
2005-12-20 17:49:12 UTC
Could you try re-emerging findutils without the "afs" USE-flag? I have the feeling you're running findutils-4.1.20-r1, which had faulty afs support (which has simply been removed in newer findutils, as "faulty" meant it didn't do anything but linking with a library it doesn't use). If this solves the problem, I will see if stabilization of >findutils-4.1.20-r1 is possible Every findutils release is broken in some way. 4.1.20-r1 is only broken for AFS, which is why we have that one stable. Could we make a findutils-4.1.20-r2 that just drops afs-support then? It would prevent further occurences of this bug, but not introduce any errors for people who haven't got the afs-useflag on anyway now. (And the afs-support wasn't doing anything but linking to an unused library anyway...) If you think that'll help, go ahead. Someone on the x86-team looked at the afs-removal patch and okayed fast stabilization. ciaranm, are you ok with this patch as well? Created attachment 75323 [details, diff]
Patch to remove afs-support from the currently stable findutils
Looks good. You should drop the keywords to ~arch though and add the arch teams to this bug -- there's a vague chance that they might have legit reasons for not wanting to stable it. Patch applied to tree and marked stable (see bug #116424). Fixed |