Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 113535

Summary: xmlindent-0.2.17 (new ebuild)
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Sascha Herrmann <starfox899>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Tom Martin (RETIRED) <slarti>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: enhancement CC: gentoo, slarti
Priority: High Keywords: EBUILD
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://xmlindent.sourceforge.net/
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: ebuild for xmlindent-0.2.17

Description Sascha Herrmann 2005-11-25 00:27:51 UTC
Hi folks,

i'd like to contribute a small ebuild for building xmlindent.

XML Indent is a XML stream reformatter written in ANSI C. It is analogous to GNU
indent.

I suggest app-text/xmlindent as package location.

Thanks.
bye fox
Comment 1 Sascha Herrmann 2005-11-25 00:29:14 UTC
Created attachment 73551 [details]
ebuild for xmlindent-0.2.17
Comment 2 Tom Martin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-27 03:18:18 UTC
Does xmlindent do anything GNU indent doesn't?
Comment 3 Sascha Herrmann 2005-11-28 04:53:08 UTC
As i wrote before xmlindent indents XML Files while GNU indent "only" reformats 
C/C++ code files! So as you can imagine both programs do completly different 
work (only using the same ideas)! 
 
Comment 4 Tom Martin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 13:43:43 UTC
Cool. I wasn't sure :)

I'll try to add it to the try sometime this week.
Comment 5 Tom Martin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-06 08:58:10 UTC
Sorry, I forgot to close this.
Comment 6 Horst Schirmeier 2006-05-09 16:35:07 UTC
Just curious. Why did you remove the ~x86 keyword Sascha proposed, and used ~amd64 ~sparc instead? He obviously tested his ebuild, so I see no reason why it should not go into x86 testing.
Comment 7 Tom Martin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-10 09:14:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Just curious. Why did you remove the ~x86 keyword Sascha proposed, and used
> ~amd64 ~sparc instead? He obviously tested his ebuild, so I see no reason why
> it should not go into x86 testing.
> 

Gentoo policy is not to mark on any archs that you, the committer, can't test on. I can't test on x86 (and I haven't had the chance to set up a 32 bit chroot on my amd64), so I can't keyword.

If you'd like this keyworded x86, please file a bug assigned to x86@gentoo.org.

Thanks :)