| Summary: | Get "aotuv" USE flag working in latest libvorbis. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Charlton Harrison <charlton> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Sound Team <sound> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | major | CC: | dv5a, gentoo |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Charlton Harrison
2005-10-25 13:47:49 UTC
This isn't strictly a bug, as libvorbis-1.1.1 doesn't have an aotuv use flag. But I strongly second this as an RFE. Currently aotuv b4.51 offers significant, ABX-able improvements over the earlier version which was merged with mainline. Charlton: although it's less convenient than what you proposed, you can run ogginfo on an encoded file to figure out what encoder was used. See this page for tons of info: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=15049 I'll try to work on a revised ebuild. (In reply to comment #1) > This isn't strictly a bug, as libvorbis-1.1.1 doesn't have an aotuv use flag. > But I strongly second this as an RFE. Currently aotuv b4.51 offers significant, > ABX-able improvements over the earlier version which was merged with mainline. > > Charlton: although it's less convenient than what you proposed, you can run > ogginfo on an encoded file to figure out what encoder was used. See this page > for tons of info: > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=15049 > > I'll try to work on a revised ebuild. > Hi, I'd like to propose another thing, that IMHO would be the Good Thing to do. libvorbis should be split into libvorbis-xiph and libvorbis-aotuv. Let the user choose between the reference library and the enthusiasts-recommended one. Even the version numbering is different. I don't know how to exactly solve dependencies, but you could try to use a libvorbis virtual package, with mutually exclusive USE flags 'vorbis-aotuv', 'vorbis-xiph' (maybe SLOTs ?). with libvorbis 1.1.2, the problem still doesn't seem to have been solved. someone kindly rectify this :) Ehm, works fine for me. How do you think it's not working? We'll handle that in that bug, I think it would be better to go with separating libvorbis into two separate packages and introduce virtual/libvorbis *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 157549 *** |