| Summary: | Make an ebuild for vmware player | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) <wolf31o2> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo VMWare Bug Squashers [disabled] <vmware+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | allistar, brebs, dante333, derick, gentoo.20.calle2003, iyoda-gentoo, iyosifov, kristaps.kaupe, lari.korpi, m.debruijne, mben12, simon.roby, yann.lugrin, zeksers |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.vmware.com/products/player/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
preliminary ebuild
VMware player ebuild |
||
|
Description
Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED)
2005-10-21 06:14:30 UTC
Please search. :p *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 109899 *** ... Amazing, you assign a bug for yourself and it gets marked as a DUP by an over-zealous bug-wrangler... *** Bug 109899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 71133 [details]
preliminary ebuild
I have attached an ebuild that doesnt fail to install. However the application
has not been tested to work. Not sure if the startup scripts are going to be
valid. Just copy the vmware-workstation dir to the vmware-player dir...
(In reply to comment #3) > Amazing, you assign a bug for yourself and it gets marked as a DUP by an > over-zealous bug-wrangler... You are asked to look for existing bugs instead creating new ones as anyone else. It was meant as a friendly short reminder. Suggest that, as it appears there are some shared files and paths, vmware-player and vmware-workstation should block each other. That is, unless someone comes up with a good reason why you'd want both - then we'd need a third app (vmware-services ?) that handles the shared stuff. <[Bug 109899]> ------- Additional Comment #1 From Paul Kronenwetter 2005-10-20 07:17 PDT [reply] ------- Just FYI - VMware Player comes with Workstation v5.5... </[Bug 109899]> I haven't tampered with the 5.5, but if the quoted comment is true a block would be adequate in the future. It would also be lesser evel if proven to be false measure. A good reason for both is if you have VMWare installed for your own virtual machines, yet you also need to use the player to connect to machines on a different computer. Created attachment 73720 [details]
VMware player ebuild
Here is an updated ebuild for vmware-player-1.0.0.18007 (adapted from the
vmware-workstation-5.5.0.18007-r1 ebuild and the vmware-player-1.0.0.16981
ebuild attached to this bug).
I have added a block on vmware-workstation. Tested and works for me.
For completeness, some files from the vmware-workstation files/ dir needs to be copied over for vmware-player: 90vmware, the config patch, vmware.rc and vmware.xml. The config patch needs to be renamed to vmware-player-1.0.0.18007-config.patch and the paths in 90vmware need to change to /opt/vmware/... instead of /opt/vmware/workstation/... (In reply to comment #11) > For completeness, some files from the vmware-workstation files/ dir needs to > be copied over for vmware-player: 90vmware, the config patch, vmware.rc and > vmware.xml. The config patch needs to be renamed to > vmware-player-1.0.0.18007-config.patch and the paths in 90vmware need to > change to /opt/vmware/... instead of /opt/vmware/workstation/... Not exactly. See, this needs to be modifed to install into /opt/vmware/player and defainitely should *not* block vmware-workstation. I'll be taking a closer look at this during this week and try to get it into portage. As much as I hate this, it wasn't a trivial task to make vmware-player and vmware-workstation install side-by-side. For one, the modules aren't compatible across all versions of vmware-workstation, meaning we would only be able to have shared services between specific branches. In the end, a blocker really is the only way to do this without spending significant resources. |