Summary: | sys-fs/navfs-0.1.6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | crusaderky |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://crusaderky.altervista.org | ||
Whiteboard: | sunrise suggested | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 108604 | ||
Attachments: |
navfs-0.1.4.ebuild
sys-fs/navfs-0.1.5.ebuild sys-fs/navfs-0.1.6.ebuild |
Description
crusaderky
2005-10-09 06:48:20 UTC
Created attachment 70214 [details]
navfs-0.1.4.ebuild
version bump version 0.1.5 [2007-02-16] ************************** - Removed dependency from vartypes.h - Fixed support for files bigger than 2GB - Fixed segmentation fault in navfs_ls - Fixed infinite loop in navfs_ls(LS_SORTED) when opening directories containing no files or only subdirectories - removed option LS_64 (now automatically active) - Windows version is now reentrant too (NEEDS TESTING) - API and ABI compatibility with version 0.1.4 has been broken Created attachment 110388 [details]
sys-fs/navfs-0.1.5.ebuild
Created attachment 112318 [details]
sys-fs/navfs-0.1.6.ebuild
navfs 0.1.6 Changelog
- API and ABI compatibility with version 0.1.5 has been broken
- Changed navfs_list structure. It's a bigger now, but a lot more manageable.
- LS_SIZE, LS_DISK_SIZE, LS_ATIME, LS_CTIME have been removed and are now always on
- Humongously improved the speed of file list sorting (from 80ms to 3ms on a directory with 1000 files)
- Added navfs_sort(), navfs_find() and navfs_find_next() to API
- Fixed a potential stack overflow when dealing with very long file names
- Fixed some memory leaks
(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug) 'EBUILD' is in the KEYWORDS which should mean that there is a ebuild attached to this bug. This bug is assigned to maintainer-wanted which means that it is not in the main tree. Heuristics show that no Gentoo developer has commented on your ebuild. Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely manner. There are simply too many new packages. Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =) Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. Thanks, On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team, Jeremy. [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/ [2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq |