Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 108565

Summary: UPDATE: hpijs 2.1.4
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Jesse Adelman <jesse>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Printing Team <printing>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX    
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=16846
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Jesse Adelman 2005-10-08 21:54:03 UTC
hpijs 2.1.4 was released on 8/22/2005. Thanks!
Comment 1 Jesse Adelman 2005-10-08 22:14:40 UTC
Selected changelog entries:

HPIJS 2.0 - This release has the following changes.

   1. HPIJS now supports bi-di and uni-di I/O. Bi-di works only with HP Linux
Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) "hp" CUPS backend.
      Bi-di provides better printer support such as DJGenricVIP four sided full
bleed and DJ3320 pen alignment.

HPIJS 2.1 - This release has the following changes.

3. Added HP postscript PPD files to the hpijs package. This will allow
postscript printing instead of printing via hpijs. 

HPIJS 2.1.4 - This release has the following changes.

 1. Fixed a bi-di problem with all LIDIL printers.
 2. Fixed a 64-bit problem with LJJetReady printers.

Cumulatively adds support for these new printers (over 1.7.1):

    HP Color LaserJet 2800
    HP Photosmart 8200
    HP Photosmart 330
    HP Photosmart 380
    Deskjet 1280
    Deskjet 3040
    Deskjet 3920
    HP LaserJet 4240
    HP LaserJet 9040
    hp color LaserJet 4610
    HP LaserJet 1022
    HP Business Inkjet 1000
    LaserJet 1010/1012/1015
    Color LaserJet 3500/3550
    HP Photosmart 8750
    HP Deskjet 6600
    HP Deskjet 9800 Series
    LaserJet 1010/1012/1015
    Color LaserJet 3500/3550
    HP Photosmart 8750
    HP Deskjet 6600
    HP Deskjet 9800 Series

And many, many other fixes.
Comment 2 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 14:25:28 UTC
hpijs is provided by hplip nowadays. Reopen if you have a good reason to bump this nevertheless.
Comment 3 Jesse Adelman 2006-01-14 15:53:23 UTC
Nope. Thank you.