| Summary: | evolution-1.2 is out.. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Torgeir Hansen <torgeir> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | andre.restivo, azarah, ed.oloughlin, matt, mholzer, pilla, sloan |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | 1.2 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Ebuilds for the new evo.... | ||
|
Description
Torgeir Hansen
2002-11-12 02:58:32 UTC
adding Az to this, as it may solve his current evo issues..? poor azarah :) *** Bug 10103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 5611 [details]
Ebuilds for the new evo....
I've tried d/l the file twice, but it seems to be corrupted at the top. aaahh.. nevermind.. Everyone else take note.. that it is a tar file.. stupid me.. okay, some points here from one who doesn't want the rest of portage to break. 1) how does this development version of gtkhtml that overwrites parts gtkhtml-1.0 interfere with other programs? 2) Why is it marked as stable for x86? 3) why is gtkhtml 1.1.6 marked stable? 4) where are the ChangeLogs ? some points from ska-fan: --->8--- - gtkhtml-1.1 and 1.0 are library- and header-wise parallel installable, but there are some files that both packages install, namely /usr/bin/ebrowser /usr/bin/gtkhtml-properties-capplet /usr/lib/bonobo/plugin/libstorage_http.a /usr/lib/bonobo/plugin/libstorage_http.la /usr/lib/bonobo/plugin/libstorage_http.so /usr/share/control-center/Documents/gtkhtml-properties.desktop /usr/share/gnome/apps/Settings/Documents/gtkhtml-properties.desktop /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml-decl.txt /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml-sections.txt /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml.hierarchy /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml.sgml /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml.types /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/gtkhtml-gtkhtml-enums.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/gtkhtml-gtkhtml-stream.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/gtkhtml-gtkhtml-types.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/gtkhtml-gtkhtmlembedded.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/gtkhtml.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/index.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/license.html /usr/share/gnome/html/gtkhtml/r /usr/share/gnome/ui/GNOME_GtkHTML_Editor.xml /usr/share/oaf /usr/share/oaf/GNOME_GtkHTML_EBrowser.oaf /usr/share/oaf/GNOME_GtkHTML_Editor.oaf ---8<--- I just built gtkhtml-1.1.6 slotted 1.1 and evo 1.0.8-r2 compiled just fine for me (i had gtkhtml-1.0.4 around ofcourse). Another dep i see problems with is gal, i'm not sure evo-1.2 really needs 0.21 . But if it does theres bug #10529 : 0.21 should stay masked. As do gtkhtml-1.1.4 and evo-1.2 at first ofcourse, but thats nothing more than the usual thing. Don't forget with gtkhtml slotted we still need to fix (or check if they need fixing) all packages who now dep on >=gtkhtml-1 . Ok.. I just built Evolution 1.2. Everything compiles fine. Inside evolution it kept my settings fine. But when I try to go to the calendar, the calendar component crashes. I heard about this earlier today, and it seemed like one of the dependencies was the culprit, but I don't know which one. Ok.. so theres a trick to this. Evolution leaves oafd running when it exits. I believe that this is where the problem is. I killed oafd and restarted evolution, and voila the calendar worked. > I just built gtkhtml-1.1.6 slotted 1.1 and evo 1.0.8-r2 compiled just fine for > me (i had gtkhtml-1.0.4 around ofcourse). > > Don't forget with gtkhtml slotted we still need to fix (or check if they need > fixing) all packages who now dep on >=gtkhtml-1 . What will happen if the user installs gtkhtml1.1 and then decides he doesn't need the 1.0 version around anymore (because he doesn't use gnucash and other apps relying on gtkhtml) and unmerges it? The duplicate files will not be removed then only if you make sure that 1.0 got installed before 1.1. foser, we cannot have gtkhtml-1.1.6 slotted, because like spider said it still overwrite the bonobo plugin, and the oaf stuff among things. yeah i figured. anyway, i run your gtkhtml now, see if i come up with any problems (not that i use a lot of gtk1 stuff these days). Besides gtkhtml there's still the gal problem (and it really depends on gal >20). There is a 0.20.1 .. think evo can work with it. Not sure though. Nope, 1.2 need gal-0.21 :( I merged it but the callendar crashed everytime I try to use it. Is anybody else having the same problem? Mauricio Lima Pilla: Check comment #10. Closing this, as its in portage. |
