Bug 105805 – sys-apps/util-linux: unintentional grant of privileges by umount (CAN-2005-2876)

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-09-13 07:36:37 UTC]

From BugTraq <[e-mail]>

Affected: Linux umount command as provided in the util-linux package in 
versions 2.8 to 2.12q, 2.13-pre1 and 2.13-pre2.

Privileges needed to exploit: local account with permission to unmount a 
user-mountable file system with Unix-type features (set-id bits or device 
nodes).

Effect: removal of nosuid, nodev and other flags from the file system, thus 
allowing setuid and setgid bits to take effect and device nodes to be 
interpreted. While this may be undesirable in itself, someone who can write 
to the underlying device or otherwise provide its contents can use this to 
obtain root privileges (for example by creating a setuid-root binary in the 
file system and having its setuid bit take effect when run).

Explanation:

When mounting a user-mountable file system, the mount command always imposes 
the nosuid and nodev flags by default, and only the superuser or an explicit 
setting in the fstab entry can override this. However, I recently discovered 
that the umount command allowed users to remove these flags again by using 
the -r option.

The -r option tells umount to try to remount the file system read-only if it 
is currently busy and cannot be unmounted fully (for example, if it is the 
current directory of some process). However, the file system is remounted 
with the MS_RDONLY ("ro") flag alone, thus clearing all its other flags, 
including nosuid and nodev. In the affected versions, the user who mounted 
the file system can use this option and easily force the unsafe remount, even 
if the file system is already read-only. If "users" was given in the fstab 
entry, then any user can do so.

Workaround: edit /etc/fstab to limit the (un)mounting of filesystems 
appropriately, or just remove the setuid bit from umount.

Fix: fixed in util-linux 2.12r-pre1 and 2.13-pre3, by refusing to accept
the -r option from a non-root user.

[Comment 1 SpanKY 2005-09-13 16:57:04 UTC]

ive added the small fix to our current stable/unstable ebuilds ... just need to
revbump em, but i'd like to glance through bugzilla and see if i cant accumulate
any other fixes at the sametime

[Comment 2 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-09-17 05:44:10 UTC]

vapier: time to revbump if nothing else can be added...

[Comment 3 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) 2005-09-18 04:59:10 UTC]

We did add -r3 .. not sure if Mike want anything else in.

[Comment 4 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-09-18 09:38:11 UTC]

Looks enough to me.
Archs, please test and mark 2.12q-r3 stable
 

[Comment 5 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2005-09-18 10:34:27 UTC]

stable on ppc64 

[Comment 6 Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2005-09-18 17:23:02 UTC]

stable on amd64

[Comment 7 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-09-18 21:19:14 UTC]

Stable on SPARC.

[Comment 8 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-09-19 09:56:14 UTC]

Stable on x86

[Comment 9 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-09-19 11:30:12 UTC]

Stable on alpha

[Comment 10 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-09-19 12:49:25 UTC]

Stable on hppa and ppc

[Comment 11 Hardave Riar (RETIRED) 2005-09-19 23:27:16 UTC]

Stable on mips.

[Comment 12 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-09-20 07:49:29 UTC]

GLSA 200509-15
arm, hppa and s390 should mark stable to benefit from GLSA