Summary: | Apache 2.0.54-r30 with +mpm-peruser crashes repeatedly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Bert Smith <bert> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Apache Team - Bugzilla Reports <apache-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alpha |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | InVCS |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | Alpha | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Patch to correct mpm-peruser on alpha |
Description
Bert Smith
2005-09-13 03:09:26 UTC
Ahem... ebuild snip: <snip> ewarn " -BIG- -FAT- -WARNING-" ewarn "" ewarn "The peruser (USE=mpm-peruser) MPM is considered highly experimental" ewarn "and are not (yet) supported, nor are they recommended for production" ewarn "use. You have been warned!" ewarn ewarn "Continuing in 5 seconds.." </snip> If it's known to be broken for certain archs, that use-flag should be masked for that arch. sparc and alpha teams: I'm not sure what the procedure for that is, please determine if you want to use-mask this. Normal procedure is what you did, ask us to test it and act accordingly. mpm-peruser appears to be broken on sparc so I've masked the use flag in the SPARC profiles. Created attachment 69012 [details, diff] Patch to correct mpm-peruser on alpha This patch corrects mpm-peruser on alpha.. the following urls are running this patch on an alpha: http://tw1.ev6.net/test.php http://tw2.ev6.net/test.php http://tw3.ev6.net/test.php http://tw4.ev6.net/test.php I masked mpm-peruser on alpha until I can test the patch properly. Hopefully that won't be too long as I quite like the idea of peruser :) Apache 2.0.58 has a new version of the mpm-peruser patch (version 0.2.0). Perhaps it is time to do additional testing and see if the issues from before are resolved? (In reply to comment #6) > Apache 2.0.58 has a new version of the mpm-peruser patch (version 0.2.0). > Perhaps it is time to do additional testing and see if the issues from before > are resolved? > I have tested mpm-peruser 0.2.0 with Apache 2.0.55 and had the same problem, the patch I proposed still applies to 0.2.0 however, and still corrects the problem on Alpha and Sparc. I also heard that AMD64 suffers the same problem, and is also corrected by my patch, but i've not verified this myself. (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Apache 2.0.58 has a new version of the mpm-peruser patch (version 0.2.0). > > Perhaps it is time to do additional testing and see if the issues from before > > are resolved? > > > > I have tested mpm-peruser 0.2.0 with Apache 2.0.55 and had the same problem, > the patch I proposed still applies to 0.2.0 however, and still corrects the > problem on Alpha and Sparc. > > I also heard that AMD64 suffers the same problem, and is also corrected by my > patch, but i've not verified this myself. Is this still an issue with current (>=net-www/apache-2.0.58-r2) ? |