Summary: | media-?/fig2ps (new package) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jonathan Stickel <jjstickel> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | graphics+disabled |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD, REVIEWED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.6.ebuild |
Description
Jonathan Stickel
2005-09-07 15:22:31 UTC
Created attachment 67874 [details]
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild
Please strip the load of useless comments. Created attachment 67878 [details]
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild
Sure thing; I was lazy and copied it from another ebuild in bugs.
Please fix the following and reopen: * http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/license.txt * http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/spacing.txt (DEPEND) * No docs to install? Created attachment 68223 [details]
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.3.ebuild
License and spacing is fixed. Docs are being installed with the "make
install". If this is not correct, then please instruct me. I think the
Makefile for the package is a little unusual.
reopen Created attachment 126490 [details]
media-gfx/fig2ps/fig2ps-1.3.6.ebuild
Version bump. Added ~amd64 keyword.
fig2ps can still be found on SourceForge but it seems the project as a whole hasn't seen any activity since April 2013 and the last VCS commit dates back to February 2010. Moreover, it seems media-gfx/transfig can do the same and more - and that is assuming all the export options currently offered by xfig itself are not enough. This bug has made no progress for years. Can we please confirm whether this package is still wanted? If it isn't, or if there is no response within 30 days, we will close this bug. Thanks Amy I'll take that as a no. |