Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 104032

Summary: dev-lang/srf (new package)
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Adrian Frühwirth <adrian+gentoo>
Component: [OLD] DevelopmentAssignee: Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: enhancement Keywords: EBUILD, REVIEWED
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: srf-1.0.ebuild
srf-1.0.ebuild
srf-1.0.ebuild

Description Adrian Frühwirth 2005-08-28 07:32:47 UTC
"srf (Simple Recursive Functions) interprets a very simple programming language
similar to Stephen Kleene's recursive functions. You can use srf to help
understand recursive functions, or Peano arithmetic."
(see http://www.users.qwest.net/~eballen1/srf.html)
Comment 1 Adrian Frühwirth 2005-08-28 07:33:51 UTC
Created attachment 67075 [details]
srf-1.0.ebuild
Comment 2 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-08-28 10:16:42 UTC
Hrm, this looks like it needs a DEPEND upon a lex implementation and a yacc
implementation.
Comment 3 Adrian Frühwirth 2005-08-28 13:21:01 UTC
Created attachment 67112 [details]
srf-1.0.ebuild

removed 'dodoc INSTALL'
added DEPEND upon flex and (bison or yacc or byacc) (readme says it should work
with any of these)
Comment 4 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-08-28 13:47:27 UTC
Ok, two tiny little things and then I'll tag this as reviewed. You don't need
the backslash for the DEPEND multiline, and I'd be inclined to stick bison first
in the || () list on the grounds that it's probably the most useful of the
three. Thanks.
Comment 5 Adrian Frühwirth 2005-08-28 14:02:13 UTC
Created attachment 67121 [details]
srf-1.0.ebuild

* fixed multiline typo
* changed order bison in dependency 

here you go...or do you want me to put each atom in the || () list in a
separate line? ;-)
Comment 6 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-08-28 14:07:15 UTC
Looks good to me. Cheers.
Comment 7 Luis Araujo (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-17 06:46:50 UTC
I already (after doing proper testing) committed this ebuild to the tree.

Thanks for submitting it.