Summary: | dev-util/paco - source code package organizer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Carlos Vendramini <carlos_vendraminibr> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | phajdan.jr |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | 2005.1 | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://paco.sourceforge.net/ | ||
Whiteboard: | sunrise suggested | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
paco-1.9.6.ebuild
paco-1.10.2.ebuild paco-2.0.3.ebuild |
Description
Carlos Vendramini
2005-08-24 17:19:45 UTC
Created attachment 69264 [details]
paco-1.9.6.ebuild
This ebuild works with the newest version of paco (1.10.2) if you comment out the entire src_unpack section. Unaltered, the ebuild fails with this message: * Fixing Makefile.am [ ok ]/usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4:36: warning: underquoted definition of AM_OPTIONS_WXCONFIG run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal /usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4:59: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_WXCONFIG /usr/share/aclocal/soundtouch.m4:29: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_SOUNDTOUCH /usr/share/aclocal/pstoedit.m4:7: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_PSTOEDIT /usr/share/aclocal/nspr.m4:8: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_NSPR /usr/share/aclocal/gsl.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_GSL /usr/share/aclocal/ao.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of XIPH_PATH_AO * Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/paco-1.10.2/work/paco-1.10.2' ... * Running aclocal ... [ ok ] * Running libtoolize --copy --force --automake ... [ ok ] * Running aclocal ... [ ok ] * Running autoconf ... [ !! ] * Failed Running autoconf ! * * Include in your bugreport the contents of: * * /var/tmp/portage/paco-1.10.2/temp/autoconf-14002.out !!! ERROR: app-arch/paco-1.10.2 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1894: Called dyn_unpack ebuild.sh, line 694: Called src_unpack paco-1.10.2.ebuild, line 26: Called eautoreconf autotools.eclass, line 66: Called eautoconf autotools.eclass, line 137: Called autotools_run_tool 'unpack' !!! Failed Running autoconf ! !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. Created attachment 80532 [details] paco-1.10.2.ebuild (In reply to comment #2) Your solution (removing src_unpack) is not correct. It will fail if sandbox is enabled. This ebuild fixes the problem (forces use of older automake). What about this programs ebuild? Will it be included in the portage-tree soon? paco 2.0 is out http://paco.sourceforge.net/index.html I'm getting compile error with 2.0.0: make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-admin/paco-2.0.0/work/paco-2.0.0/paco' x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -W -I.. -I../lib -DLIBDIR='"/usr/lib64"' -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wshadow -fno-operator-names -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -MT paco-Options.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/paco-Options.Tpo -c -o paco-Options.o `test -f 'Options.cc' || echo './'`Options.cc x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -W -I.. -I../lib -DLIBDIR='"/usr/lib64"' -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wshadow -fno-operator-names -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -MT paco-PkgSet.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/paco-PkgSet.Tpo -c -o paco-PkgSet.o `test -f 'PkgSet.cc' || echo './'`PkgSet.cc PkgSet.cc: In member function ‘void Paco::PkgSet::lsPkgs()’: PkgSet.cc:234: error: no matching function for call to ‘max(uint&, size_t)’ make[2]: *** [paco-PkgSet.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... mv -f .deps/paco-Options.Tpo .deps/paco-Options.Po make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-admin/paco-2.0.0/work/paco-2.0.0/paco' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-admin/paco-2.0.0/work/paco-2.0.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 !!! ERROR: app-admin/paco-2.0.0 failed. Created attachment 128637 [details]
paco-2.0.3.ebuild
(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug) 'EBUILD' is in the KEYWORDS which should mean that there is a ebuild attached to this bug. This bug is assigned to maintainer-wanted which means that it is not in the main tree. Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely manner. There are simply too many new packages. Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =) Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. Thanks, On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team, Jeremy. [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/ [2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq |