Summary: | vsftpd ftp server no longer works | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | André Terpstra <andre> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Roy Marples (RETIRED) <uberlord> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
VSFTPD main config
XINETD main config XINETD vsftpd config |
Description
André Terpstra
2005-08-08 12:55:09 UTC
Please attach your /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf and /etc/xinetd.d/vsftpd files and post which version of vsftpd you're having this issue with. Created attachment 65542 [details]
VSFTPD main config
Created attachment 65543 [details]
XINETD main config
Oh now the problem may become apparent! I noticed a downgrade but now I see to what: AthenaGentoo ~ # equery list -p vsftpd [ Searching for package 'vsftpd' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [ ] net-ftp/vsftpd-1.2.2 (0) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [M ] net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 (0) AthenaGentoo ~ # emerge -pv vsftpd These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild R ] net-ftp/vsftpd-1.2.2 +ipv6 +pam +tcpd 0 kB Total size of downloads: 0 kB A Created attachment 65544 [details]
XINETD vsftpd config
vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 is stable on x86 - why did it downgrade yours? Try re-emerging vsftpd-2* Roy: I don't know! As my post shows it is masked somehow. Maybe because it's a 2.4 kernel? Should I force this? How? Andr Roy: I don't know! As my post shows it is masked somehow. Maybe because it's a 2.4 kernel? Should I force this? How? André. AFAIK nothing is masking vsftpd-2* Check for it in /etc/portage/package.mask (if you have that file) or just grep for it grep vsftpd /etc/portage/* -R lastly, try this emerge -av "=net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1" it may tell you why it's masked. I'm sorry, it's my own stupid fault. I indeed had masked it out in /etc/portage/package.mask. I think it was because an update was blocked by ftpbase and I wanted to get rid of that message; then I entered that line incorrectly so it was downgraded instead. Sorry again for wasting your time. See my previous remark. It wasn't a bug after all. |