Summary: | xorgcfg fails with "BadDrawable" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Georgi Georgiev <chutz+bugs.gentoo.org> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2005.0 | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3925 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Georgi Georgiev
2005-07-29 17:00:44 UTC
Noting your kernel, does it fail in the same way with 2.6.12 or some other stable kernel? This is pretty clearly looking like an upstream bug, so let's send it there. Georgi, please file at bugs.freedesktop.org and post the URL here. (In reply to comment #1) > Noting your kernel, does it fail in the same way with 2.6.12 or some other > stable kernel? Could you clarify what it is that you noted about my kernel? 2.6.12.3 is the latest *stable* kernel according to kernel.org and that's exactly what I'm using. I still have the older 2.6.{7,10,11.x} in /boot so I guess I could give them a try. (In reply to comment #2) > This is pretty clearly looking like an upstream bug, so let's send it there. > Georgi, please file at bugs.freedesktop.org and post the URL here. I really, really hope that it is not a mistake on my end, or I'd end up looking real stupid. :) Will do, and will report here again. First to reboot a few times though. As expected, the kernel didn't affect anything. Tried 2.6.7 only. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3925 is the upstream bugreport. Closing as upstream (following a previous example). (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Noting your kernel, does it fail in the same way with 2.6.12 or some other > > stable kernel? > > Could you clarify what it is that you noted about my kernel? 2.6.12.3 is the > latest *stable* kernel according to kernel.org and that's exactly what I'm > using. I still have the older 2.6.{7,10,11.x} in /boot so I guess I could give > them a try. My apologies, I actually read that as a non-stable version (the -y2 threw me off). You are correct, that is a stable version. |