Bug 1004

Summary:	alsa-oss-0.9.0.1_beta10.ebuild should be masked
Product:	Portage Development	Reporter:	jochem prins <j.prins>
Component:	Unclassified	Assignee:	Daniel Robbins (RETIRED) <drobbins>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	major
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description jochem prins 2002-03-07 14:46:35 UTC

alsa-oss-0.9.0.1_beta10.ebuild should be masked due to the same reasons as the
other alsa-0.9's ebuilds are masked. 
The problem can be solved by add the line:
=media-libs/alsa-oss-0.9.0.1_beta10 in package.mask

Comment 1 Tod M. Neidt (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2002-03-12 09:58:23 UTC

Can you be more specific on why it should be masked?  I was considering
unmasking all the alsa-0.9's as creating a link for libasound.so.1 appears to
fix the original problems.

Comment 2 jochem prins 2002-03-12 16:52:46 UTC

Due to the fact that at the moment it was uncertain when the alsa-0.9 drivers
would become available for download, i considered this bug-report as usefull
since people could accidently try to emerge it and get errors during the
emerge-process at the libasound-check as well. Since this problem was already
reported in packages.mask for the other 3 alsa-0.9 drivers, this package
couldn't be left out for the very same reason. But if you've fixed the alsa-0.9
problem than this bug can also been seen as solved i guess.