Summary: | eclass/perl-module.eclass DEPEND lowered to 5.8.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Dick Marinus <dick> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Perl team <perl> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | ppc-macos |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2005.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | OS X | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Dick Marinus
2005-07-26 01:12:11 UTC
What's the version of MakeMaker on darwin? There were significant changes in the syntax of a call to MakeMaker in the early transition from the 5.6 series to the 5.8 series that affect how we build into vendor - just need to be sure that you have at least the minimum :) MakeMaker (luckely) isn't provided by darwin (I can't find it), ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.20 has keyword ~ppc in gentoo portage. MakeMaker is there. It has to be. Otherwise darwin's perl would never, ever, ever be able to install modules. Ever. perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'print "$ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION\n"' oh, well, that made me look stupid :) $ perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'print "$ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION\n"' 6.12 (In reply to comment #4) > $ perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'print "$ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION\n"' > 6.12 In that case - no. Not without forcing darwin users to use at least MM 6.15 - <6.15 had broken behaviour with -PREFIX and -DISTDIRs (and I'd really prefer, since we're forcing this, that you have at least 6.17, but that's just me trying to be cross complient with all the MM's) thanks a lot, I suppose it's okay as it is... What's wrong with requiring that your extutils makemaker be upgraded? Other than the lack of a reverse inc, which means it will never get invoked...so maybe never mind... |