|
Lines 1872-1877
class depgraph:
Link Here
|
| 1872 |
if self._dynamic_config._allow_backtracking: |
1872 |
if self._dynamic_config._allow_backtracking: |
| 1873 |
self._slot_operator_trigger_reinstalls() |
1873 |
self._slot_operator_trigger_reinstalls() |
| 1874 |
|
1874 |
|
|
|
1875 |
# When there needs to be additional slot operator rebuilds, |
| 1876 |
# _solve_non_slot_operator_slot_conflicts is not aware of them, |
| 1877 |
# so it ends up pulling in subslot dependencies according to the |
| 1878 |
# installed subslots. This causes "slot conflict" entries to be added |
| 1879 |
# to backtrack infos, and portage would backtrack by masking each |
| 1880 |
# version. This is not ideal because portage now have to do multiple |
| 1881 |
# backtracks, for each version masked. It also implies that portage |
| 1882 |
# is attempting to pull in those versions, and this may cause issues |
| 1883 |
# during subslot rebuild pruning. Instead of that, let portage solve |
| 1884 |
# slot operator rebuilds first, then backtrack on slot conflicts, if |
| 1885 |
# they are truly necessary after slot operator rebuilds are considered. |
| 1886 |
if self._dynamic_config._backtrack_infos.setdefault("config", {}).get( |
| 1887 |
"slot_operator_replace_installed", set() |
| 1888 |
): |
| 1889 |
if "slot conflict" in self._dynamic_config._backtrack_infos: |
| 1890 |
del self._dynamic_config._backtrack_infos["slot conflict"] |
| 1891 |
return |
| 1892 |
|
| 1875 |
def _process_slot_conflict(self, conflict): |
1893 |
def _process_slot_conflict(self, conflict): |
| 1876 |
""" |
1894 |
""" |
| 1877 |
Process slot conflict data to identify specific atoms which |
1895 |
Process slot conflict data to identify specific atoms which |
