Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 39254 Details for
Bug 63431
Error applying a patch in binutils
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
Output generated when trying to apply a patch
90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2-15316.out (text/plain), 19.45 KB, created by
Sorin Schwimmer
on 2004-09-09 08:19:13 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
Output generated when trying to apply a patch
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Sorin Schwimmer
Created:
2004-09-09 08:19:13 UTC
Size:
19.45 KB
patch
obsolete
>***** 90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 ***** > >============================================================== > >PIPE_COMMAND: bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch > >============================================================== >can't find file to patch at input line 4 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >5 out of 5 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 79 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >2 out of 2 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 128 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 139 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 157 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 188 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 224 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >============================================================== > >PIPE_COMMAND: bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch > >============================================================== >patching file bfd/elf-bfd.h >Hunk #1 succeeded at 1215 with fuzz 2 (offset 13 lines). >patching file bfd/elf.c >Hunk #1 FAILED at 967. >Hunk #2 succeeded at 2300 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines). >Hunk #3 succeeded at 3555 (offset 50 lines). >Hunk #4 succeeded at 4199 (offset 92 lines). >Hunk #5 FAILED at 4751. >2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elf.c.rej >patching file bfd/elflink.h >Hunk #1 FAILED at 1909. >Hunk #2 FAILED at 1945. >2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elflink.h.rej >patching file binutils/readelf.c >Hunk #1 FAILED at 2144. >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file binutils/readelf.c.rej >patching file include/bfdlink.h >Hunk #1 succeeded at 313 with fuzz 2 (offset 11 lines). >patching file include/elf/common.h >Hunk #1 FAILED at 289. >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/elf/common.h.rej >patching file ld/emultempl/elf32.em >Hunk #1 succeeded at 1704 with fuzz 2 (offset 59 lines). >Hunk #2 FAILED at 1750. >Hunk #3 FAILED at 1762. >2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/emultempl/elf32.em.rej >patching file ld/ldgram.y >Hunk #1 FAILED at 1014. >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/ldgram.y.rej >============================================================== > >PIPE_COMMAND: bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch > >============================================================== >can't find file to patch at input line 4 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >5 out of 5 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 79 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >2 out of 2 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 128 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 139 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 157 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 188 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 224 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >============================================================== > >PIPE_COMMAND: bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch > >============================================================== >missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 4 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >5 out of 5 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 79 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >2 out of 2 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 128 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 139 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 157 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 188 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 224 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >============================================================== > >PIPE_COMMAND: bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/15316.patch > >============================================================== >missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 4 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >5 out of 5 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 79 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h 2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >2 out of 2 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 128 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 139 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 157 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 157 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h 2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 188 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 188 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 224 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y >|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100 >|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y 2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100 >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 63431
: 39254