Attachment 39221 Details for Bug 63344 – 90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2-6135.out

90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2-6135.out

90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2-6135.out (text/plain), 19.45 KB, created by Ben Thomas on 2004-09-08 15:15:45 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Ben Thomas

Created: 2004-09-08 15:15:45 UTC

Size: 19.45 KB

patch

obsolete

>***** 90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 *****
>
>===============================================================
>
>PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>
>===============================================================
>can't find file to patch at input line 4
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 17
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>5 out of 5 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 79
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>2 out of 2 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 128
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 139
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 157
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 188
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>3 out of 3 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 224
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>===============================================================
>
>PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>
>===============================================================
>patching file bfd/elf-bfd.h
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 1215 with fuzz 2 (offset 13 lines).
>patching file bfd/elf.c
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 967.
>Hunk #2 succeeded at 2300 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).
>Hunk #3 succeeded at 3555 (offset 50 lines).
>Hunk #4 succeeded at 4199 (offset 92 lines).
>Hunk #5 FAILED at 4751.
>2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elf.c.rej
>patching file bfd/elflink.h
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 1909.
>Hunk #2 FAILED at 1945.
>2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elflink.h.rej
>patching file binutils/readelf.c
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 2144.
>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file binutils/readelf.c.rej
>patching file include/bfdlink.h
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 313 with fuzz 2 (offset 11 lines).
>patching file include/elf/common.h
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 289.
>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/elf/common.h.rej
>patching file ld/emultempl/elf32.em
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 1704 with fuzz 2 (offset 59 lines).
>Hunk #2 FAILED at 1750.
>Hunk #3 FAILED at 1762.
>2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/emultempl/elf32.em.rej
>patching file ld/ldgram.y
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 1014.
>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/ldgram.y.rej
>===============================================================
>
>PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>
>===============================================================
>can't find file to patch at input line 4
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 17
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>5 out of 5 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 79
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>2 out of 2 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 128
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 139
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 157
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 188
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>3 out of 3 hunks ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 224
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>===============================================================
>
>PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>
>===============================================================
>missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 4
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 17
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>5 out of 5 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 79
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>2 out of 2 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 128
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 139
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 157
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>can't find file to patch at input line 188
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>3 out of 3 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 224
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>===============================================================
>
>PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/6135.patch
>
>===============================================================
>missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 4
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 17
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c	2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>5 out of 5 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 79
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h	2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>2 out of 2 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 128
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 139
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h	2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 157 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 157
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h	2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 188 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 188
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>3 out of 3 hunks ignored
>missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch
>can't find file to patch at input line 224
>Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
>|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
>|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y	2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
>--------------------------
>No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Actions: View

Attachments on bug 63344: 39221