|
Lines 588-593
class slot_conflict_handler(object):
Link Here
|
| 588 |
else: |
588 |
else: |
| 589 |
violated_atom = atom.unevaluated_atom.violated_conditionals(_pkg_use_enabled(pkg), \ |
589 |
violated_atom = atom.unevaluated_atom.violated_conditionals(_pkg_use_enabled(pkg), \ |
| 590 |
pkg.iuse.is_valid_flag, parent_use=_pkg_use_enabled(ppkg)) |
590 |
pkg.iuse.is_valid_flag, parent_use=_pkg_use_enabled(ppkg)) |
|
|
591 |
if violated_atom.use is None: |
| 592 |
# It's possible for autounmask to change |
| 593 |
# parent_use such that the unevaluated form |
| 594 |
# of the atom now matches, even though the |
| 595 |
# earlier evaluated form (from before |
| 596 |
# autounmask changed parent_use) does not. |
| 597 |
# In this case (see bug #374423), it's |
| 598 |
# expected that violated_atom.use is None. |
| 599 |
continue |
| 591 |
|
600 |
|
| 592 |
if pkg.installed and (violated_atom.use.enabled or violated_atom.use.disabled): |
601 |
if pkg.installed and (violated_atom.use.enabled or violated_atom.use.disabled): |
| 593 |
#We can't change USE of an installed package (only of an ebuild, but that is already |
602 |
#We can't change USE of an installed package (only of an ebuild, but that is already |
| 594 |
- |
|
|
