Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 224275 Details for
Bug 310279
sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1 fails to patch 78_all_use-relro.patch for mips because 77_all_generate-gnu-hash.patch is skipped
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
78_all_use-relro.patch.out
78_all_use-relro.patch.out (text/plain), 4.75 KB, created by
Stuart Longland (RETIRED)
on 2010-03-19 20:02:41 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
78_all_use-relro.patch.out
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Stuart Longland (RETIRED)
Created:
2010-03-19 20:02:41 UTC
Size:
4.75 KB
patch
obsolete
>***** 78_all_use-relro.patch ***** > >================================== > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/patch/78_all_use-relro.patch' > >================================== >can't find file to patch at input line 6 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|background: >|http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/189 >| >|--- binutils/ld/ldmain.c >|+++ binutils/ld/ldmain.c >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >| >|many tests rely on order of symbols and the relro option changes that. >|so to avoid having to constantly thrash in the test files, use the normal >|relro option that everyone tests against. >| >|--- binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >|+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >================================== > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/patch/78_all_use-relro.patch' > >================================== >patching file ld/ldmain.c >Hunk #1 succeeded at 266 (offset -27 lines). >patching file ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >Hunk #1 FAILED at 84. >Hunk #2 FAILED at 158. >Hunk #3 FAILED at 189. >3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp.rej >================================== > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/patch/78_all_use-relro.patch' > >================================== >can't find file to patch at input line 6 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|background: >|http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/189 >| >|--- binutils/ld/ldmain.c >|+++ binutils/ld/ldmain.c >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >| >|many tests rely on order of symbols and the relro option changes that. >|so to avoid having to constantly thrash in the test files, use the normal >|relro option that everyone tests against. >| >|--- binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >|+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >================================== > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/patch/78_all_use-relro.patch' > >================================== >missing header for unified diff at line 6 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 6 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|background: >|http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/189 >| >|--- binutils/ld/ldmain.c >|+++ binutils/ld/ldmain.c >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >| >|many tests rely on order of symbols and the relro option changes that. >|so to avoid having to constantly thrash in the test files, use the normal >|relro option that everyone tests against. >| >|--- binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >|+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored >================================== > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/patch/78_all_use-relro.patch' > >================================== >missing header for unified diff at line 6 of patch >can't find file to patch at input line 6 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|background: >|http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/189 >| >|--- binutils/ld/ldmain.c >|+++ binutils/ld/ldmain.c >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >1 out of 1 hunk ignored >can't find file to patch at input line 17 >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >| >|many tests rely on order of symbols and the relro option changes that. >|so to avoid having to constantly thrash in the test files, use the normal >|relro option that everyone tests against. >| >|--- binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >|+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp >-------------------------- >No file to patch. Skipping patch. >3 out of 3 hunks ignored
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 310279
:
224273
| 224275 |
229733