[2007/02/18 16:01:41] <eroyf> heh, i remeber i had a good reason not to test kde-3.5.6
[2007/02/18 16:01:44] <Flameeyes> eroyf, do me a favour and _do not_ ~mips kde-meta-3.5.6
[2007/02/18 16:01:48] <eroyf> can't remember what it is
[2007/02/18 16:01:53] <eroyf> no, i wont do that
[2007/02/18 16:01:59] <Flameeyes> err s/6/5/
[2007/02/18 16:02:03] <eroyf> WHUT
[2007/02/18 16:02:11] <phreak``> haha
[2007/02/18 16:02:11] <eroyf> i had a reason to do
[2007/02/18 16:02:12] <eroyf> it
[2007/02/18 16:02:14] <eroyf> can't remember
[2007/02/18 16:02:21] <Flameeyes> I don't want to leave -meta-3.5.5 in the tree indefinitely because you can't keyword a newer version
[2007/02/18 16:02:33] <Flameeyes> so if you want to go with -meta-3.5.6 fine, otherwise LEAVE IT WITHOUT ~MIPS MARKING
[2007/02/18 16:02:57] <eroyf> ohgod...
[2007/02/18 16:03:01] <spbecker> Flameeyes: or, you could stop being a twat and let eroyf do what he wants to do
[2007/02/18 16:03:05] <Flameeyes> and you could at least try to mark ~mips a newer version of kdelibs 3.5.5, as every other arch is in -r8, and I need
 to leave -r4 in tree just for you
[2007/02/18 16:03:08] <Flameeyes> spbecker, no.
[2007/02/18 16:03:25] <eroyf> the kdelibs thingy
[2007/02/18 16:03:37] <eroyf> there is a bug on that?
[2007/02/18 16:04:00] <Flameeyes> spbecker, considering *I'm* the one stuck with three hundreds ebuilds that can't be cleaned up for no reason, I have
 all the rights to ask eroyf NOT TO keyword -meta-3.5.5 if he's not going to keyword 3.5.6 too.
[2007/02/18 16:04:07] <Flameeyes> eroyf, one or two I think
[2007/02/18 16:04:25] <spbecker> Flameeyes: not really, arch teams can keyword what they like
[2007/02/18 16:04:27] <Flameeyes> bug #152818
[2007/02/18 16:04:31] <jeeves> Flameeyes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/152818 nor, P2, All, flameeyes@gentoo.org->mips@gentoo.org, NEW, pending, kde-base/k
delibs-3.5.5-r7 re-keywording request
[2007/02/18 16:04:45] <eroyf> gracias
[2007/02/18 16:05:09] <Flameeyes> spbecker, tell you what: they would, if they would also allow dropping keywords when they are just hindering ebuild
maintenance. as you don't allow to drop keywords, you have to accept that the devleoper ask NOT TO keyword something too.
[2007/02/18 16:05:36] <Flameeyes> beside, you said you were retiring, can you just stop annoying the hell out of me and retire at once?
[2007/02/18 16:05:43] <spbecker> I am retiring
[2007/02/18 16:05:54] <Flameeyes> then mind your own business
[2007/02/18 16:06:06] <spbecker> Flameeyes: I am minding my business
[2007/02/18 16:06:09] <eroyf> the mips team values his work... just like we do with ciaranm
[2007/02/18 16:06:24] <spbecker> Flameeyes: so again, stop being a twat, and let eroyf do his work
[2007/02/18 16:06:25] <Flameeyes> spbecker, no, you're messing with something that is not. KDE maintenace is NOT your business.
[2007/02/18 16:06:44] <spbecker> Flameeyes: and kde maintenance on mips is not your business
[2007/02/18 16:06:52] <Flameeyes> spbecker, if his works categories as "hindering KDE team by keywording 300 packages he can't maintain in the future"
, then I won't let him do that.
[2007/02/18 16:07:27] <spbecker> Flameeyes: he'll get things fixed in time
[2007/02/18 16:07:34] <spbecker> Flameeyes: you are currently being a fuckhead just to be a fuckhead
[2007/02/18 16:07:51] <Flameeyes> no, I'm considering my users
[2007/02/18 16:08:21] <spb> it's not your job to let him or not to let him keyword anything
[2007/02/18 16:08:22] <Flameeyes> sticking 300 ebuilds for an indefinite time into the tree just for the sake of ~mips keywording is NOT going to help
 my usres
[2007/02/18 16:08:35] <Flameeyes> you got the monolithic version, and that I can leave indefinitely
[2007/02/18 16:08:40] <Flameeyes> but 300 -meta packages are NOT the same thing
[2007/02/18 16:08:52] <Flameeyes> spb, it is my job as they are my packages
[2007/02/18 16:09:01] <spb> and they're our keywords
[2007/02/18 16:09:16] <spbecker> it's your job to maintain the ebuilds, not mips keywords
[2007/02/18 16:09:24] <spbecker> so you really have little say
[2007/02/18 16:09:45] <spbecker> and again, you are being a dick just because you can be right now...like I said, he'll get it sorted out
[2007/02/18 16:09:46] <Flameeyes> spbecker, no, the one with little to say is you, as you ended up insulting