Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 768934 Details for
Bug 836876
GLEP 59: Fix spelling of "deprecate"
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
[patch]
Fix spelling of "deprecate"
0001-glep-0059-Fix-spelling-of-deprecate.patch (text/plain), 2.99 KB, created by
Ulrich Müller
on 2022-04-06 06:30:58 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
Fix spelling of "deprecate"
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Ulrich Müller
Created:
2022-04-06 06:30:58 UTC
Size:
2.99 KB
patch
obsolete
>From 6db2455e2b776eb1fec2b535d991caf7c06762ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: =?UTF-8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=BCller?= <ulm@gentoo.org> >Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:27:03 +0200 >Subject: [PATCH] glep-0059: Fix spelling of "deprecate" >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > >Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> >--- > glep-0059.rst | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/glep-0059.rst b/glep-0059.rst >index 035ee45..ae50b66 100644 >--- a/glep-0059.rst >+++ b/glep-0059.rst >@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Type: Standards Track > Status: Final > Version: 1 > Created: 2008-10-22 >-Last-Modified: 2017-11-16 >+Last-Modified: 2022-04-06 > Post-History: 2009-12-01, 2010-01-31 > Content-Type: text/x-rst > Requires: 44 >@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ by a preference list. Over time, the weaker checksums should be removed > from Manifest2 files, once all old Portage installations have had > sufficient time to upgrade. Stronger checksums shall be added as soon as > an implementation is available in Portage. Weak checksums may be removed >-as long as the depreciation process is followed (see below). >+as long as the deprecation process is followed (see below). > > As soon as feasible, we should add the SHA512 and WHIRLPOOL algorithms. > In future, as stream-based checksums are developed (in response to the >@@ -124,21 +124,21 @@ Python implementations available, ranging from pure Python to C-based > The existence unsupported hash is not considered to be a failure unless > no supported hashes are available for a given Manifest entry. > >-Checksum depreciation timing >----------------------------- >+Checksum deprecation timing >+--------------------------- > General principles: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >-A minimum set of depreciated checksums shall be maintained only to >+A minimum set of deprecated checksums shall be maintained only to > support old package manager versions where needed by historically used > trees: > >-- New package manager versions should NOT use depreciated checksums in >+- New package manager versions should NOT use deprecated checksums in > >-- New trees with that have never used the depreciated checksums may omit >+- New trees with that have never used the deprecated checksums may omit > them for reasons of size, but are still strongly suggested to include > them. > >-- Removal of depreciated checksums shall happen after no less than 18 >+- Removal of deprecated checksums shall happen after no less than 18 > months or one major Portage version cycle, whichever is greater. > > Immediate plans: >@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ After the majority of Portage installations include SHA512 support: > Backwards Compatibility > ======================= > Old versions of Portage may support and expect only specific checksums. >-This is accounted for in the checksum depreciation discussion. >+This is accounted for in the checksum deprecation discussion. > > For maximum compatibility, we should only have to include each of the > old algorithms that we are officially still supporting, as well as the >-- >2.35.1 >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Diff
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
|
Diff
Attachments on
bug 836876
: 768934