Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 61818 Details for
Bug 96894
[version bump] xscreensaver-4.22
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
files/gentoo-philosophy
gentoo-philosophy (text/plain), 4.67 KB, created by
Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
on 2005-06-23 17:43:10 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
files/gentoo-philosophy
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
Created:
2005-06-23 17:43:10 UTC
Size:
4.67 KB
patch
obsolete
>The Philosophy of Gentoo > >I created Gentoo because I couldn't find a Linux distribution that I liked. The >one predominant thing that I experienced with Linux distributions is that the >"distro tools" that managed the entire system -- the tools that were supposed to >make everything easier to use -- really seemed to want a lot of attention and >really got in the way of what I wanted to do. I wanted to tell them what I >wanted to do, but they seemed more interested in telling me what they wanted me >to do. > >So, I created Gentoo Linux, and designed Portage to be a more perfect tool than >what had existed before it. To do this, I made it very flexible in allowing me >to do what I wanted to do, and also tried to make it flexible to allow others to >do what I thought they might want to do. > >If others wanted to see how a package got built, they could look at a >relatively easy-to-understand ebuild file and learn from it. If they wanted to >tweak how it got built, they took advantage of USE variables. If they wanted >to add a package, they created a new ebuild for the tree. If they wanted to >use a package, they simply emerged it and dependencies were automatically >resolved. > >People liked the Portage concept, and Gentoo Linux grew rapidly. We have >become known as a "from source" distribution, but the heart of the Gentoo >concept is not "from source." "From source" is an important and key aspect of >Gentoo, and something that was and will continue to be necessary for Gentoo, >but it is not the only issue or most fundamental issue. The most fundamental >issue is designing a technology that allows us and others to do what they want >to do, without restriction. > >To summarize the heart of Gentoo, imagine a user sitting in front of a Linux >system. What does he or she want to do? The Gentoo philosophy is to allow this >user to do what he or she wants to do, without getting in the way. > >At around the time Gentoo was born, the thing that got in the way was the lack >of an easy way to build packages from source, to a user's specifications. >Currently, we've done that very well, but what we haven't done very well is >support pre-built packages, even though Portage has supported building binary >packages almost since its inception. So we are doing that now. > >It's important that our tools support binary packages, because binary packages >are widely used and widely in demand in the Linux community. If our tools >don't support binary packages, then we can't claim that our tools are designed >to allow a user to do anything he or she might want to do. If we purposely >choose to exclude binary support, then we are attempting to interfere with how >users might choose to approach particular problems, by instead imposing our >own will or view of how they should approach a problem. And if we do not build >binary packages, then we are not taking any steps to ensure that our tools >actually work well with binary packages, nor are we taking steps to ensure >that others can build binary packages, nor are we able to *demonstrate* that >our tools work well with binary packages. Besides these philosophical reasons, >there are many practical reasons to create binary packages. > >The Gentoo philosophy, in a paragraph, is this. Every user has work they need >to do. The goal of Gentoo is to design tools and systems that allow a user to >do their work pleasantly and efficiently as possible, as they see fit. Our >tools should be a joy to use, and should help the user to appreciate the >richness of the Linux and free software community, and the flexibility of >free software. This is only possible when the tool is designed to reflect >and transmit the will of the user, and leave the possibilities open as to >the final form of the raw materials (the source code.) If the tool forces >the user to do things a particular way, then the tool is working against, >rather than for, the user. We have all experienced situations where tools >seem to be imposing their respective wills on us. This is backwards, and >contrary to the Gentoo philosophy. > >Put another way, the Gentoo philosophy is to create better tools. When a >tool is doing its job perfectly, you might not even be very aware of its >presence, because it does not interfere and make its presence known, nor >does it force you to interact with it when you don't want it to. The tool >serves the user rather than the user serving the tool. > >The future goal of Gentoo is to continue to strive to create near-ideal >tools. Tools that can accomodate the needs of many different users (all with >divergent goals) with ease are extremely powerful. Don't you love it when >you find a tool that does exactly what you want to do? Doesn't it feel >great? Our mission is to give that sensation to as many people as possible. > >Daniel Robbins >Previous Chief Architect
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 96894
:
61816
|
61817
| 61818 |
61819
|
61820
|
61821