Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 9815 - dev-tcltk/itcl should have a itclConfig.sh
Summary: dev-tcltk/itcl should have a itclConfig.sh
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: SpanKY
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-28 01:10 UTC by SpanKY
Modified: 2003-11-30 23:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-10-28 01:10:36 UTC
when packages try to compile with iTCL support, they look for the itclConfig.sh 
script to give them information (the same way that TCL has a tclConfig.sh 
in /usr/lib):
 - what version is installed
 - where are the header files
 - where are the libraries
 - where are the binaries

without this script, packages assume iTCL is not installed
Comment 1 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-11 11:09:31 UTC
itclConfig.sh doesn't (nor anything that resembles it) appear in the itcl
sources. This appears to be a RedHat-ism. Can you check if could steal theirs
verbatim, and if so, just attach it here, and I'll get to it ? 

I see it's referred to in the CHANGES file in itcl-3.2, but it's not being built
at compile-time, nor is it referred to anywhere else in the sources. Strange...
Comment 2 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-03 08:29:50 UTC
Didn't seem to get to the bottom of this. If you're still angry, reopen the bug and I'll give it a second attempt.
Comment 3 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-03 10:29:57 UTC
Sorry. I don't have the capacity to deal with tcl and tk stuff anymore.
Comment 4 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-13 12:17:00 UTC
wanna fix this, spankz?
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-11-30 23:14:57 UTC
i have no idea anymore what package this was for ... but if i remember, i'll re-open this bug and make said script