Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 95374 - Domain registration renewal
Summary: Domain registration renewal
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Foundation
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Proposals (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Other
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Board of Trustees
URL:
Whiteboard: finance-audit:NOT-REQUIRED finance-st...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-07 11:41 UTC by Corey Shields
Modified: 2021-10-11 20:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Corey Shields 2005-06-07 11:41:31 UTC
We need to vote on this.  Kudos to Lance for setting up bugzilla as a way to do this and have it collected & archived.

This is for the purchase of 1 yr renewal of the following domains:

GENTOO-DEVICES.COM
GENTOO-DEVICES.NET
GENTOO-DEVICES.ORG
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.COM
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.NET
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.ORG
GENTOODEVICES.COM
GENTOODEVICES.NET
GENTOODEVICES.ORG
GENTOOEMBEDDED.COM
GENTOOEMBEDDED.NET
GENTOOEMBEDDED.ORG

the cost is 1yr - $161.10  (8.95 each).

Further discussion can be found on the gentoo-trustees list, subject [gentoo-trustees] [Fwd: 5-Day Certified GoDaddy.com Renewal Notice]
Comment 1 Corey Shields 2005-06-07 11:42:49 UTC
I vote for this purchase..
Comment 2 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 11:46:40 UTC
I'm for it.
Comment 3 Grant Goodyear (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 12:10:44 UTC
Aye
Comment 4 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 12:19:08 UTC
yes
Comment 5 Daniel Ostrow (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 12:22:39 UTC
As one who has seen the value of the company you are working for owning
FORBESSUCKS.COM and FORBESBLOWS.COM in addition to FORBES.COM I see the value in
these. I'm for it.
Comment 6 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 12:50:37 UTC
I don't know exactly why we have need for them, but I won't be against, if all
of you think, that this is a good thing[tm].  Count this as an abstention.
Comment 7 Jason Huebel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 18:13:05 UTC
aye
Comment 8 Corey Shields 2005-06-07 20:30:00 UTC
I left out the following in the list.  The price I quoted is correct, and covers
the following as well:

GENTOO-GAMES.COM
GENTOO-GAMES.NET
GENTOO-GAMES.ORG
GENTOOGAMES.COM
GENTOOGAMES.NET
GENTOOGAMES.ORG

sorry for the confusion.
Comment 9 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 20:36:37 UTC
Aye
Comment 10 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-08 04:08:23 UTC
aye
Comment 11 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-08 06:43:08 UTC
I'm all for it
Comment 12 Kurt Lieber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-08 06:55:44 UTC
Going against the grain....I vote no.  I don't think we need all these domains,
personally.  We're not even using a majority of them.  Go to:

http://www.gentoo-devices.com/
http://www.gentoo-devices.net/
http://www.gentoo-devices.org/

http://www.gentoodevices.com/
http://www.gentoodevices.net/
http://www.gentoodevices.org/

They all point to the default godaddy home page. (and I didn't even check the
others) Why are we paying for something we aren't using?  If it's to protect
against cybersquatting, then why don't we have things like:

gentoo-server.(com|net|org)
gentoo-ppc.(com|net|org)
gentoo-amd.(com|net|org)

registered?

$161.50 is 1-2 nights in a cheaper hotel for a dev at LWE.  I'd rather put that
money towards that expense than a handful of domain names that we aren't using.
Comment 13 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-08 12:26:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)

> They all point to the default godaddy home page. (and I didn't even check the
> others) Why are we paying for something we aren't using?  If it's to protect
> against cybersquatting, then why don't we have things like:

I should point out that most of the domains (minus the games ones) were a direct
result of the threats from zynot. Daniel bought those in fear of zynot using
them for profit, etc. I figured I should at least let you guys know this.

Kurt does have a good point, the problem right now is timing. Maybe we could
come up with good uses for some of them, we just don't have a lot of time to
make up a decision on that. If anything, I think the games domain would be good
for something (Corey mentioned to me before he had an idea or two for that). As
it stands now, I think we should just renew them all this year, and then work on
making a long term decision on them in the next coming months.
Comment 14 Joshua Kinard gentoo-dev 2005-06-08 17:22:05 UTC
Hmm, I find myself fence sitting here, leaning somewhat to Kurt's reasoning on
this.  From the looks of things, Zynot's about as dead as a terrorist facing the
business end of an M1A2's main cannon, so I don't think there is much of a
threat (I'd even go as far as to say there's no threat al all anymore) of them
swiping said domain names.  So the answer to the question of re-registering them
seems for me to lean towards the "Nay" side of things.  As Kurt said, The money
is probably better spent on things like LWE (which I'm gonna have to attend one
of these days it looks now...).
Comment 15 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-10 11:31:01 UTC
So, does anyone want to retract their decision on renewing all the domains?
Would like to get this done ASAP if possible. 
Comment 16 Kurt Lieber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-10 11:41:34 UTC
Would it make sense to make the relative groups justify why the trustees should
fund this renewal?  We have an embedded team, we have a games team/herd....why
not leave it up to them on whether or not to renew.  (and, if they want to
renew, make them explain why it's worth the money)

This just seems like a frivilous purchase to me.  We don't use the domains
today, haven't used them for the past year....dropping a hundred bucks in case
we MAY want to use them in the future just doesn't seem like a wise investment.
Comment 17 Corey Shields 2005-06-10 13:27:02 UTC
I like Kurt's idea..  Should we do this?  Give them 2 days to respond with 
their ideas/plans.. 
 
The flipside to this is that other groups may want their own domain pointers as 
well  (www.gentoo-amd64-rocks.com, whatever).. If we give these existing 
domains to their "groups", then it would be unfair to purchase domains for the 
other groups. This leads me back to my original opposing opinion that 
everything should fall under the *.gentoo.org realm.  My agreeing to the 
purchase now was to buy us time to figure out what we want to do with them.  In 
hindsight yeah, that might not be the best reasoning. 
Comment 18 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-10 15:27:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> The flipside to this is that other groups may want their own domain pointers 
> as well  (www.gentoo-amd64-rocks.com, whatever).. If we give these existing 
> domains to their "groups", then it would be unfair to purchase domains for the 
> other groups.

Do you mean unfair to _not_ purchase domains for the others?

> This leads me back to my original opposing opinion that 
> everything should fall under the *.gentoo.org realm.  My agreeing to the 
> purchase now was to buy us time to figure out what we want to do with them. In 
> hindsight yeah, that might not be the best reasoning. 

That was my reasoning as well, but since there appears to be no real rush to act
on this and nobody else has been snapping the domains up, we seem to have time
to rethink it.
Comment 19 Joshua Kinard gentoo-dev 2005-06-11 13:59:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> The flipside to this is that other groups may want their own domain pointers as 
> well  (www.gentoo-amd64-rocks.com, whatever).. If we give these existing 
> domains to their "groups", then it would be unfair to purchase domains for the 
> other groups. This leads me back to my original opposing opinion that 
> everything should fall under the *.gentoo.org realm.  My agreeing to the 
> purchase now was to buy us time to figure out what we want to do with them.  In 
> hindsight yeah, that might not be the best reasoning. 

For mips, I'm perfectly fine with mips.gentoo.org.  I think it's a far "cooler"
name than www.gentoo-mips-roxxors-your-boxxors.net or whatever.  Granted we
haven't updated the mips page in oh, an eon, but regardless of that, purchasing
domains that simply act as pointers back to what we already get for free seems
to be, as kurt put it, frivilous.  Other arch teams may disagree with me on
this, though.

As far the other domain names, I think it's a good idea to let the
embedded/games herds have a say, since they'd probably make use of such domains,
but at the same time, they may carry an opinion closer to what I stated above
(i.e., embedded.g.o or games.g.o)

Comment 20 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-21 06:30:39 UTC
I renewed the following domains for one year costing a total of $110.40:

GENTOO-DEVICES.COM
GENTOO-DEVICES.NET
GENTOO-DEVICES.ORG
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.COM
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.NET
GENTOO-EMBEDDED.ORG
GENTOODEVICES.COM
GENTOODEVICES.NET
GENTOODEVICES.ORG
GENTOOEMBEDDED.COM
GENTOOEMBEDDED.NET
GENTOOEMBEDDED.ORG

You may notice that gentoo-games.* isn't in the list. I had just missed the
deadline to renew them and I'm in the process of getting into phone contact with
GoDaddy to try and sort those. Sorry about missing that, but I was trying to get
more input from this bug before going ahead with it.
Comment 21 Corey Shields 2005-10-11 15:52:17 UTC
closing the bug..
Comment 22 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-11-13 20:31:27 UTC
Reopening to collect data/reimburse if needed.

ramereth:
I can't find any record that you were reimbursed for the domain renewal, or how it was made. I know it was a decade ago, but if you have any records for it, that would be superb (if you're still pending reimbursement, we can pay ;-).
Comment 23 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-11-27 16:38:35 UTC
(In reply to Robin Johnson from comment #22)
> Reopening to collect data/reimburse if needed.
> 
> ramereth:
> I can't find any record that you were reimbursed for the domain renewal, or
> how it was made. I know it was a decade ago, but if you have any records for
> it, that would be superb (if you're still pending reimbursement, we can pay
> ;-).

Wow...

I honestly have no idea but I'd probably guess I wasn't.
Comment 24 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2017-11-28 18:16:58 UTC
I spoke to Lance, and as best we can figure it was never reimbursed, and just forgotten about. He would like to be reimbursed via 
paypal.me/ramereth
Comment 25 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-08-13 04:42:29 UTC
Profile paypal.me/ramereth is disabled per paypal, waiting to hear back from Lance.
Comment 27 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-10-11 20:21:07 UTC
no response, closing