905606 – dev-libs/weston-11.0.1: stabilisation

Bug 905606 - dev-libs/weston-11.0.1: stabilisation

Summary: dev-libs/weston-11.0.1: stabilisation

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	James Le Cuirot

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	python3.11-stable
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2023-05-02 19:27 UTC by Sam James
Modified:	2023-06-13 18:09 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:	dev-libs/weston-11.0.1 amd64 arm arm64 ppc64 x86
Runtime testing required:	Yes

Flags:	nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Sam James archtester

2023-05-02 19:27:47 UTC

Good to go? Needed for Python 3.11.

Comment 1 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev

2023-05-02 19:32:29 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

Sanity check failed:

> dev-libs/weston-11.0.1
>   depend ppc stable profile default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/17.0/32bit-userland (4 total)
>     sys-auth/seatd:=
>   rdepend ppc stable profile default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/17.0/32bit-userland (4 total)
>     sys-auth/seatd:=

Comment 2 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev

2023-05-02 21:33:48 UTC

I think we may have to drop ppc, ppc64, ia64, and sparc keywords entirely because of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/issues/739, but I don't have a good feel for how badly it is broken in practise. I vaguely recall one or two people saying they'd actually tried it, but that was a long time ago. This would involve masking gui-libs/gtk[test].

Let's get the others stabilised anyway.

Comment 3 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-05-05 09:43:08 UTC

arm64 done

Comment 4 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev

2023-05-16 11:00:20 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

Sanity check failed:

> dev-libs/weston-11.0.1
>   depend arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/musl/armv6j (4 total)
>     >=sys-apps/systemd-209[pam]
>   rdepend arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/musl/armv6j (4 total)
>     >=sys-apps/systemd-209[pam]

Comment 5 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev

2023-05-16 23:04:19 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

All sanity-check issues have been resolved

Comment 6 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-05-27 06:32:47 UTC

arm done

Comment 7 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-05-27 06:35:00 UTC

amd64 done

Comment 8 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-05-27 06:35:02 UTC

x86 done

all arches done

Comment 9 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev

2023-05-27 08:20:39 UTC

I now realise that the ppc64 keyword covering both big and little endian means that I can't drop that keyword if I want everything to line up. Please could you at least run the tests on ppc64le.

Comment 10 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-06-01 19:19:24 UTC

(In reply to James Le Cuirot from comment #9)
> I now realise that the ppc64 keyword covering both big and little endian
> means that I can't drop that keyword if I want everything to line up. Please
> could you at least run the tests on ppc64le.

tested on bogsucker.ppc64 (ppc64le devbox), and it passes tests. Do I understand correctly you want to stable it only on ppc64le (done by adding ppc64 keyword + masking on ppc64be profile).

Comment 11 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev

2023-06-01 20:35:17 UTC

(In reply to Arthur Zamarin from comment #10)
> (In reply to James Le Cuirot from comment #9)
> > I now realise that the ppc64 keyword covering both big and little endian
> > means that I can't drop that keyword if I want everything to line up. Please
> > could you at least run the tests on ppc64le.
> 
> tested on bogsucker.ppc64 (ppc64le devbox), and it passes tests. Do I
> understand correctly you want to stable it only on ppc64le (done by adding
> ppc64 keyword + masking on ppc64be profile).

Thank you. Just the keyword is fine, it's already masked in the big-endian feature profile.

Comment 12 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2023-06-13 18:09:55 UTC

ppc64 done

all arches done